Journal of Advances in Environmental Health Research

Journal of Advances in Environmental Health Research

Enhancing Wastewater Treatment Efficiency Using MBBR: A Media Selection Approach

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 Kish International Campus, University of Tehran, Kish, Iran
2 Department of Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Environment, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
10.34172/jaehr.1371
Abstract
Background: Wastewater treatment is a critical environmental challenge, and moving bed biofilm reactor (MBBR) technology is an effective solution. The selection of appropriate biofilm media significantly impacts treatment efficiency, particularly in terms of organic matter and nutrient removal. This study aims to optimize media selection for MBBR systems to improve wastewater treatment.
Methods: Three biofilm media types-K3, MB3, and K5-were evaluated based on key properties such as specific surface area (SSA), porosity, buoyancy, and economic feasibility. The analytical hierarchy process (AHP) was employed to assess and prioritize these criteria. Expert Choice software facilitated the analysis, followed by a laboratory-scale investigation to assess pollutant removal efficiency.
Results: K5 media outperformed K3 and MB3 in terms of nitrogen removal (90%), chemical oxygen demand (COD) reduction (90%), biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) elimination (95%), and TSS removal (89%). K5 also demonstrated superior efficiency in pollutant removal while maintaining consistent pH regulation. K3 and MB3 displayed relatively lower performance, especially in nitrogen and COD removal.
Conclusion: The study confirms that K5 media, selected using the AHP method, provides the highest treatment efficiency in MBBR systems. The AHP-based media selection process enhances the decision-making process, ensuring that economic and performance factors are adequately considered. Future studies should focus on scaling up the MBBR system with K5 media to further evaluate its long-term performance in real-world conditions.
Keywords

Subjects


  1. Sohail N, Ahmed S, Chung S, Nawaz MS. Performance comparison of three different reactors (MBBR, MBR and MBBMR) for municipal wastewater treatment. Desalin Water Treat. 2020;174:71-8. doi: 5004/dwt.2020.24866.
  2. Shokri R, Jalilzadeh Yengejeh R, Babaei AA, Derikvand E, Almasi A. Removal of azithromycin from wastewater using advanced oxidation processes (UV/H2O2) and moving-bed biofilm reactor (MBBR) by the response surface methodology (RSM). J Adv Environ Health Res. 2019;7(4):249-59. doi: 22102/jaehr.2019.205819.1146.
  3. Ebadi M, Asareh A, Jalilzadeh Yengejeh R, Hedayat N. Investigation of electro-coagulation process for phosphate and nitrate removal from sugarcane wastewaters. Iran J Toxicol. 2021;15(1):19-26. doi: 32598/ijt.15.1.483.4.
  4. Azarm L, Javadzadeh N, Jalilzadeh Yengejeh R. Investigation of Chlorella vulgaris capacity in absorption of nitrate and phosphate from wastewater of fish farming pool in Khuzestan province. J Anim Environ. 2020;12(2):291-8. doi: 22034/aej.2020.107264.
  5. Nikpour B, Jalilzadeh Yengejeh R, Takdastan A, Hassani AH, Zazouli MA. Studying the effluent quality of enhanced modified Ludzack Ettinger-oxic settling anaerobic process (E-MLE-OSA) for treating real municipal wastewater. J Adv Environ Health Res. 2021;9(4):345-60. doi: 32598/jaehr.9.4.1243.
  6. Shobirynia M, Jalilzadeh Yengejeh R, Derikvand E, Mohammadi Rouzbahani M. Comparison of electro-fenton and photoelectro-fenton for removal of acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) from petrochemical wastewater. Main Group Chem. 2023;23(2):133-44. doi: 3233/mgc-230063.
  7. Mahdavi M, Mahvi AH, Salehi M, Sadani M, Biglari H, Tashauoei HR, et al. Wastewater reuse from hemodialysis section by combination of coagulation and ultrafiltration processes: case study in Saveh-Iran hospital. Desalin Water Treat. 2020;193:274-83. doi: 5004/dwt.2020.25799.
  8. Verijkazemi K, Jalilzadeh Yengejeh R. Simulation of an industrial wastewater treatment plant by up-flow anaerobic fixed bed bioreactor based on an artificial neural network. Avicenna J Environ Health Eng. 2022;9(1):1-8. doi: 34172/ajehe.2022.01.
  9. Heidari Farsani M, Jalilzadeh Yengejeh R, Hajiseyed Mirzahosseini A, Monavari M, Hassani AH, Mengelizadeh N. Study of the performance of bench-scale electro-membranes bioreactor in leachate treatment. Adv Environ Technol. 2021;7(3):209-20. doi: 22104/aet.2022.5266.1426.
  10. Takdastan A, Kordestani B, Nisi A, Jalilzadeh Yangjeh R. Study of operational and maintenance problems and parameters of extended aeration activated sludge process in Golestan hospital wastewater treatment plant, Ahvaz, and their solutions. J Environ Health Eng. 2016;3(4):270-9. doi: 18869/acadpub.jehe.3.4.270.
  11. Amini Fard F, Jalilzadeh Yengejeh R, Ghaeni M. Efficiency of microalgae Scenedesmus in the removal of nitrogen from municipal wastewaters. Iran J Toxicol. 2019;13(2):1-6. doi: 32598/ijt.13.2.483.2.
  12. Azanaw A, Birlie B, Teshome B, Jemberie M. Textile effluent treatment methods and eco-friendly resolution of textile wastewater. Case Stud Chem Environ Eng. 2022;6:100230. doi: 1016/j.cscee.2022.100230.
  13. Birniwa AH, Ali U, Kutty SR, Jagaba AH, Noor A. Innovative and eco-friendly technologies for the upgradation of pharmaceutical wastewater treatment processes. In: Khan AH, Khan NA, Naushad M, Aziz HA, eds. The Treatment of Pharmaceutical Wastewater. Elsevier; 2023. p. 367-98. doi: 1016/b978-0-323-99160-5.00006-0.
  14. Grace Pavithra K, Jaikumar V, Kumar PS, Sundar Rajan P. A review on cleaner strategies for chromium industrial wastewater: present research and future perspective. J Clean Prod. 2019;228:580-93. doi: 1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.117.
  15. Garcia KA, McLee P, Schuler AJ. Effects of media length on biofilms and nitrification in moving bed biofilm reactors. Biofilm. 2022;4:100091. doi: 1016/j.bioflm.2022.100091.
  16. Kruszelnicka I, Kramarczyk DG, Poszwa P, Stręk T. Influence of MBBR carriers’ geometry on its flow characteristics. Chem Eng Process Process Intensif. 2018;130:134-9. doi: 1016/j.cep.2018.06.009.
  17. Ahmadlouydarab M, Mehrazaran M. Application of lab-scale MBBR to treat industrial wastewater using K3 carriers: effects of HRT, high COD influent, and temperature. Int J Environ Sci Nat Resour. 2019;20(2):35-42. doi: 19080/ijesnr.2019.20.556031.
  18. Chu L, Wang J. Comparison of polyurethane foam and biodegradable polymer as carriers in moving bed biofilm reactor for treating wastewater with a low C/N ratio. Chemosphere. 2011;83(1):63-8. doi: 1016/j.chemosphere.2010.12.077.
  19. Yakar A, Türe C, Türker OC, Vymazal J, Saz Ç. Impacts of various filtration media on wastewater treatment and bioelectric production in up-flow constructed wetland combined with microbial fuel cell (UCW-MFC). Ecol Eng. 2018;117:120-32. doi: 1016/j.ecoleng.2018.03.016.
  20. Mazioti AA, Koutsokeras LE, Constantinides G, Vyrides I. Untapped potential of moving bed biofilm reactors with different biocarrier types for bilge water treatment: a laboratory-scale study. Water. 2021;13(13):1810. doi: 3390/w13131810.
  21. Dezotti M, Lippel G, Bassin JP. Advanced Biological Processes for Wastewater Treatment. Springer; 2018.
  22. Proano-Pena G, Carrano AL, Blersch DM. Analysis of very-high surface area 3D-printed media in a moving bed biofilm reactor for wastewater treatment. PLoS One. 2020;15(8):e0238386. doi: 1371/journal.pone.0238386.
  23. Spoerk M, Holzer C, Gonzalez-Gutierrez J. Material extrusion-based additive manufacturing of polypropylene: a review on how to improve dimensional inaccuracy and warpage. J Appl Polym Sci. 2020;137(12):48545. doi: 1002/app.48545.
  24. Zhu L, Yuan H, Shi Z, Deng L, Yu Z, Li Y, et al. Metagenomic insights into the effects of various biocarriers on moving bed biofilm reactors for municipal wastewater treatment. Sci Total Environ. 2022;813:151904. doi: 1016/j.scitotenv.2021.151904.
  25. Elliott O, Gray S, McClay M, Nassief B, Nunnelley A, Vogt E, et al. Design and manufacturing of high surface area 3D-printed media for moving bed bioreactors for wastewater treatment. J Contemp Water Res Educ. 2017;160(1):144-56. doi: 1111/j.1936-704X.2017.03246.x.
  26. Ho W, Ma X. The state-of-the-art integrations and applications of the analytic hierarchy process. Eur J Oper Res. 2018;267(2):399-414. doi: 1016/j.ejor.2017.09.007.
  27. Larichev OI, Moshkovich HM. ZAPROS-LM—a method and system for ordering multiattribute alternatives. Eur J Oper Res. 1995;82(3):503-21. doi: 1016/0377-2217(93)e0143-l.
  28. Saaty TL. The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1980..
  29. Nyuysoni SB, Mutua JM, Home PG. Mathematical model development and 3D printing of cylindrically shaped biofilm carrier media from recycled plastic waste for wastewater treatment. J Environ Prot. 2022;13(1):15-31. doi: 4236/jep.2022.131002.
  30. Boyle K. Optimization of Moving Bed Biofilm Reactor (MBBR) Operation for Brewery Wastewater Treatment [dissertation]. University of Ottawa; 2019. doi: 20381/ruor-23395.
  31. Madan S, Madan R, Hussain A. Advancement in biological wastewater treatment using hybrid moving bed biofilm reactor (MBBR): a review. Appl Water Sci. 2022;12(6):141. doi: 1007/s13201-022-01662-y.
  32. Phanwilai S, Kangwannarakul N, Noophan P, Kasahara T, Terada A, Munakata-Marr J, et al. Nitrogen removal efficiencies and microbial communities in full-scale IFAS and MBBR municipal wastewater treatment plants at high COD:N ratio. Front Environ Sci Eng. 2020;14(6):115. doi: 1007/s11783-020-1374-2.
  33. Kängsepp P, Sjölin M, Mutlu AG, Teil B, Pellicer-Nàcher C. First full-scale combined MBBR, coagulation, flocculation, Discfilter plant with phosphorus removal in France. Water Pract Technol. 2020;15(1):19-27. doi: 2166/wpt.2019.081.
  34. Proano-Pena G, Carrano AL, Blersch DM. Analysis of very-high surface area 3D-printed media in a moving bed biofilm reactor for wastewater treatment. PLoS One. 2020;15(8):e0238386. doi: 1371/journal.pone.0238386.