Increasing of leachate quality using an integrated aerobic membrane bioreactor

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Assistant Professor of environmental health engineering, health faculty, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran

2 Environmental Health Research Center, Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, Sanandaj, Iran

3 Department of Environmental Health Engineering, School of Health, Yazd University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran

4 Department of Environmental Health Engineering, School of Health, Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences, Shahrekord, Iran

Abstract

The aim of this study was the increasing of leachate quality using integrated membrane bioreactor (MBR). The reactor was fed with treated leachate with overall 70-1360 mg/l chemical oxygen demand (COD). The analysis of COD, biochemical oxygen demand (BOD5), total suspended solids (TSS), and total dissolved solids (TDS) were performed in feed and filtrate, whenever the system reached steady state twice a week for 6 months. In all loading rate, BOD5 concentration was less than the standard limit. The removal efficiency of COD in all experiments was up to 80%. Up to 99% of solids, which may mainly include colloidal solids, were removed with micropore membrane. There was no significant difference between TDS concentration in feed and filtrate. It was concluded that MBR is a versatile technology with high throughput and can treat compost leachate below standard limit if used after appropriate processes. 

Keywords

References

  1. Taiwo AM. Composting as A Sustainable Waste Management Technique in Developing Countries. Journal of Environmental Science and Technology 2011; 4(2): 93-102.
  2. Safari E, Jalili Ghazizade M, Shokouh A, Nabi Bidhendi GR. Anaerobic removal of COD from high strength fresh and partially stabilized leachates and application of multi stage kinetic model. International Journal of Environmental Research 2011; 5(2): 255-70.
  3. Hashemi H, Ebrahimi A, Khodabakhshi A. Investigation of anaerobic biodegradability of real compost leachate emphasis on biogas harvesting. Int J Environ Sci Technol 2015; 12(9); 2841-6.
  4. Castrillon L, Fernandez-Nava Y, Ulmanu M, Anger I, Maranon E. Physico-chemical and biological treatment of MSW landfill leachate. Waste Manag 2010; 30(2): 228-35.
  5. Abbas AA, Jingsong G, Ping LZ, Ya PY, Al-Rekabi WS. Review on landfill leachate treatments. Journal of Applied Sciences Research 2009; 5(5): 534-45.
  6. Neczaj E, Kacprzak M, Lach J, Okoniewska E. Effect of sonication on combined treatment of landfill leachate and domestic sewage in SBR reactor. Desalination 2007; 204(1-3): 227-33.
  7. Hashemi H, Hajizadeh Y, Amin MM, Bina B, Ebrahimi A, Khodabakhshid A, et al. Macropollutants removal from compost leachate using membrane separation process. Desalination and Water Treatment 2015.
  8. Kaewsuk J, Thorasampan W, Thanuttamavong M, Seo GT. Kinetic development and evaluation of membrane sequencing batch reactor (MSBR) with mixed cultures photosynthetic bacteria for dairy wastewater treatment. J Environ Manage 2010; 91(5): 1161-8.
  9. Ahmed FN, Lan CQ. Treatment of landfill leachate using membrane bioreactors: A review. Desalination 2012; 287: 41-54.
  10. Chan YJ, Chong MF, Law CL, Hassell DG. A review on anaerobic-aerobic treatment of industrial and municipal wastewater. Chemical Engineering Journal 2009; 155(1-2): 1-18.
  11. Eaton AD, Franson MA. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. Washington, DC: American Public Health Association; 2005.
  12. Laitinen N, Luonsi A, Vilen J. Landfill leachate treatment with sequencing batch reactor and membrane bioreactor. Desalination 2006; 191(1-3): 86-91.
  13. Campagna M, alCakmakci M, Busra Yaman F, Ozkaya B. Molecular weight distribution of a full-scale landfill leachate treatment by membrane bioreactor and nanofiltration membrane. Waste Management 2013; 33(4): 866-70.
  14. Insel G, Dagdar M, Dogruel S, Dizge N, Ubay CE, Keskinler B. Biodegradation characteristics and size fractionation of landfill leachate for integrated membrane treatment. J Hazard Mater 2013; 260:
  15. -32.
  16. Brown K, Ghoshdastidar AJ, Hanmore J, Frazee J, Tong AZ. Membrane bioreactor technology: A novel approach to the treatment of compost leachate. Waste Management 2013; 33(11): 2188-94.
  17. Garces A, De Wilde W, Thoeye C, GueldreG. Operational cost optimization of MBR Schilde. Proceedings of the 4th IWA International Membranes Conference-Membranes for Water and Wastewater Treatment; 2007 May 15-17; Harrogate, UK.
  18. Achilli A, Cath TY, Marchand EA, Childress AE. The forward osmosis membrane bioreactor: A low fouling alternative to MBR processes. Desalination 2009; 239(1-3): 10-21.
  19. Le-Clech P, Jefferson B, Judd SJ. A comparison of submerged and sidestream tubular membrane bioreactor configurations. Desalination 2005; 173(2): 113-22.
Journal of Advances in Environmental Health Research
Volume 3, Issue 1 - Serial Number 1
8
January 2015
Pages 27-32

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics