Radiological dose assessment of naturally occurring radioactive materials generated by the petroleum industry in wildlife: A case study of chinkaras of Lavan Island, Iran

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Department of Environmental Engineering, School of Health Sciences, Yonsei University, Wonju, South Korea

2 Department of Solid Waste Engineering, Graduate School of Environment, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

3 Department of Coastal Engineering, Graduate School of Environment, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Human activities such as oil and gas production can enhance the natural level of naturally occurring radioactive materials (NORM) in by-product and waste streams. Iran has been among the top five oil producing countries since 2005. This high production rate emphasizes the importance of NORM management to ensure the safety of humans and wildlife. Petroleum storage and transport facilities are located at Lavan Island, Iran. Presence of animals including dolphins, sea turtles, and chinkaras make this island one of the most unique wildlife refuges in Iran. This paper combines waste disposal methods relevant to the petroleum offshore industries, NORM waste characteristics, and geographical, geological, and climate conditions of Lavan Island in order to develop enveloping exposure scenarios. Sludge burning is determined as the most concerning scenario by assuming chinkaras as the endpoint. Ecological and radiological assessment procedure is modeled with MATLAB-Simulink as a dynamic system. Clearance level for radiation protection of chinkaras is calculated as 41 Bq/kg. This value may be insufficient for radiation protection of workers, because exposure pathways are not derived based on human behavior. According to environmental pathways and condition of chinkaras, this value sufficiently covers all aspects of radiation protection. 

Keywords

References

  1. Gazineu MH, Hazin CA. Radium and potassium-40 in solid wastes from the oil industry. Appl Radiat Isot 2008; 66(1): 90-4.
    2. Ojovan M, Lee WE. Naturally occurring radionuclides. In: Ojovan M, Lee WE, Editors. An introduction to nuclear waste immobilization. Oxford, UK: Elsevier Ltd; 2005. p. 43-52.
    3. Landa ER. Naturally occurring radionuclides from industrial sources: characteristics and fate in the environment. In: Shaw G, Editor. Radioactivity in the terrestrial environment. Oxford, UK: Elsevier; 2007.
    p. 211-37.
    4. International Atomic Energy Agency. Assessing the need for radiation protection measures in work involving minerals and raw materials. Vienna, Austria: International Atomic Energy Agency; 2006.
    p. 11-26.
    5. Smith K, Argonne national lab il environmental assessment and information sciences div. Radiological Dose Assessment Related to Management of Naturally Occurring Radioactive Materials Generated by the Petroleum Industry. Chicago, IL: Argonne national lab il environmental assessment and information Sciences Division, 1996. p. 10-6.
    6. Jerez Vegueria SF, Godoy JM, Miekeley N. Environmental impact studies of barium and radium discharges by produced waters from the "Bacia deCampos" oil-field offshore platforms, Brazil. J Environ Radioact 2002; 62(1): 29-38.

    7. Betti M, Aldave de las HL, Janssens A, Henrich E, Hunter G, Gerchikov M, et al. Results of the European Commission Marina II study: part II--effects of discharges of naturally occurring radioactive material. J Environ Radioact 2004; 74(1-3): 255-77. 

    8. Abo-Elmagd M, Soliman HA, Salman K, El-Masry NM. Radiological hazards of TENORM in the wasted petroleum pipes. J Environ Radioact 2010; 101(1): 51-4.
    9. Hrichi H, Baccouche S, Belgaied JE. Evaluation of radiological impacts of tenorm in the Tunisian petroleum industry. J Environ Radioact 2013; 115: 107-13.
    10. Gäfvert T, Færevik I, Rudjord AL. Assessment of the discharge of NORM to the North Sea from produced water by the Norwegian oil and gas industry. In: Povinec PP, Sanchez-Cabeza JA, Editors. International conference on isotopes and environmental studies. Oxford, UK: Elsevier; 2006. p. 193-205.
    11. Khodashenas A, Roayaei E, Abtahi SM, Ardalani E. Evaluation of naturally occurring radioactive materials (NORM) in the South Western oil wells of Iran. J Environ Radioact 2012; 109: 71-5.
    12. Moatar F, Shadizadeh S, Karbassi A, Ardalani E, Akbari Derakhshi R, Asadi M. Determination of naturally occurring radioactive materials (NORM) in formation water during oil exploration. Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry 2010; 283(1):
    3- 7.
    13. Till JE, Grogan HA. Radiological risk assessment and environmental analysis. 1st ed. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 2008. p. 1-28.
    14. International Atomic Energy Agency. Derivation of activity limits for the disposal of radioactive waste in near surface disposal facilities. Vienna, Austria: International Atomic Energy Agency; 2004. p. 73-138.

    15. International Atomic Energy Agency. Safety assessment methodologies for near surface disposal facilities. Vienna, Austria: International Atomic Energy Agency; 2004. p. 90-138.

    16. Amaku M, Pascholati PR, Vanin VR. Decay chain differential equations: Solution through matrix algebra. omputer Physics Communications 2010; 181(1): 21-3. 

    17. Johansen MP, Barnett CL, Beresford NA, Brown JE, Cerne M, Howard BJ, et al. Assessing doses to terrestrial wildlife at a radioactive waste disposal site: inter-comparison of modelling approaches. Sci Total Environ 2012; 427-428: 238-46.
    18. Copplestone D, Beresford NA, Brown JE, Yankovich
    T. An international database of radionuclide concentration ratios for wildlife: development and uses. J Environ Radioact 2013; 126: 288-98.
    19. International Atomic Energy Agency. Quantification of radionuclide transfer in terrestrial and freshwater environments for radiological assessments. Vienna, Austria: International Atomic Energy Agency; 2009.
    p. 476-94.
    20. Amiro BD. Radiological dose conversion factors for generic non-human biota used for screening potential ecological impacts. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity 1997; 35(1): 37-51.
    21. Howard BJ, Beresford NA, Copplestone D, Telleria D, Proehl G, Fesenko S, et al. The IAEA handbook on radionuclide transfer to wildlife. J Environ Radioact 2013; 121: 55-74.
    22. Chermitti A, Boukli-Hacene O, Meghebbar A, Bibitriki N, Kherous A. Design of a library of components for autonomous photovoltaic system under Matlab/Simulink. Physics Procedia 2014; 55: 199-206.
    23. International Atomic Energy Agency. Generic models for use in assessing the impact of discharges of radioactive substances to the environment. Vienna, Austria: International Atomic Energy Agency; 2001. p. 12-28.
    24. Yankovich T, Beresford NA, Fesenko S, Fesenko J, Phaneuf M, Dagher E, et al. Establishing a database of radionuclide transfer parameters for freshwater wildlife. J Environ Radioact 2013; 126:
    299- 313.

Journal of Advances in Environmental Health Research
Volume 2, Issue 4 - Serial Number 4
7
December 2014
Pages 215-222

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics