Application of artificial neural network (ANN) for the prediction of water treatment plant influent characteristics

Document Type : Original Article


1 Kurdistan Environmental Health Research Center, School of Health, Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, Sanandaj, Iran

2 Center for Water Quality Research (CWQR), Institute for Environmental Research (IER), Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran


Application of a reliable forecasting model for any water treatment plant (WTP) is essential in order to provide a tool for predicting influent water quality and to form a basis for controlling the operation of the process. This would minimize the operation and analysis costs, and assess the stability of WTP performances. This paper focuses on applying an artificial neural network (ANN) approach with a feed-forward back-propagation non-linear autoregressive neural network to predict the influent water quality of Sanandaj WTP. Influent water quality data gathered over a 2-year period were used to building the prediction model. The study signifies that the ANN can predict the influent water quality parameters with a correlation coefficient (R) between the observed and predicted output variables reaching up to 0.93. The prediction models developed in this work for Alkalinity, pH, calcium, carbon dioxide, temperature, total hardness, turbidity, total dissolved solids, and electrical conductivity have an acceptable generalization capability and accuracy with coefficient of determination (R2) ranging from 0.86 for alkalinity to 0.54 for electrical conductivity. The predicting ANN model provides an effective analyzing and diagnosing tool to understand and simulate the non-linear behavior of the influent water characteristics. The developed predicting models can be used by WTP operators and decision makers.


1. Maest AS, Kuipers JR, Travers CL, Atkins DA. Predicting water quality at hardrock mines: methods and models, uncertainties, and state-of-the-art. Washington, DC: Earthworks; 2005.
2. Witten IH, Frank E, Hall MA. Data mining: practical machine learning tools and techniques. 2nd ed. Burlington, MA: Morgan Kaufmann; 2005.
3. Zhang G, Eddy Patuwo B, Hu MY. Forecasting with artificial neural networks: The state of the art. International Journal of Forecasting 2013; 14(1): 35-62.
4. Chen Y, Yang B, Dong J, Abraham A. Time-series forecasting using flexible neural tree model. Information Sciences 2013; 174(3-4): 219-35.
5. Giordano F, La Rocca M, Perna C. Forecasting nonlinear time series with neural network sieve bootstrap. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis 2007; 51(8): 3871-84.
6. Lapedes A. Nonlinear signal processing using neural networks: Prediction and system modelling. Los Alamos National Laboratory; 1987.
7. Imrie CE, Durucan S, Korre A. River flow prediction using artificial neural networks: generalisation beyond the calibration range. Journal of Hydrology 2000; 233(1-4): 138-53.
8. Wu GD, Lo ShL. Effects of data normalization and inherent-factor on decision of optimal coagulant dosage in water treatment by artificial neural network. Expert Systems with Applications 2010; 37(7): 4974-83.
9. Melessea AM, Ahmad S, McClaina ME, Wangc X, Limd YH. Suspended sediment load prediction of river systems: An artificial neural network approach. Agricultural Water Management 2011; 98(5): 855-66.
10. Huo Sh, He Z, Su J, Xi B, Zhu Ch. Using artificial neural network models for eutrophication prediction. Procedia Environmental Sciences 2013; 18: 310-6.
11. Patil K, Deo MC, Ghosh S, Ravichandran M. Predicting sea surface temperatures in the North Indian Ocean with nonlinear autoregressive neural networks. International Journal of Oceanography 2013; 2013.
12. Delgrangea N, Cabassuda C, Cabassudb N, Durand-Bourlierc L, Lainec JM. Neural networks for prediction of ultrafiltration transmembrane pressure – application to drinking water production. Journal of Membrane Science 1998; 150(1): 111-23.
13. Looney CG. Pattern recognition using neural networks: theory and algorithms for engineers and scientists. New York, NY: Oxford University Press Inc; 1997.
14. Demuth H, Beale M, Hagan M. Neural network toolbox™ 6. user guide. Natick, MA: Math Works; 2008.
15. Hagan MT, Demuth HB, Beale MH. Neural network design. Stamford, CT: Thomson Learning; 1996.
16. Teng CM. Correcting noisy data. Proceedings of 16th International Conference on Machine Learning; 1999 Jun 27-30; San Francisco, USA.
17. Arthur RM. Application of on-line analytical instrumentation to process control. Proceedings of the 1st Annual Conference on Activated Sludge Process Control; 1982;. Chicago, Ill, USA.
18. Tarassenko LA. Guide to neural computing applications. Oxford, UK: Butterworth-Heinemann; 1998.
19. Olssen G, Newell B. Wastewater treatment systems, modelling, diagnosis and control. London, UK: IWA Publishing; 1999.
20. Masters T. Practical neural network recipes in C++. San Diego, CA: Academic Press; 1993.
21. Hyndman RJ, Koehler AB. Another look at measures of forecast accuracy. International Journal of Forecasting 2006; 22(4): 679-88.
22. Rumelhart DE, Hinton GE, Williams RJ. Learning internal representations by error propagation. In: Rumelhart DE, McClelland JL, PDP Research Group. Parallel distributed processing: explorations in the microstructure of cognition. Cambridge, MA: A Bradford Book; 1987. 
23. Zhu J, Zurcher J, Rao M, Meng MQH. An on-line wastewater quality predication system based on a time-delay neural network. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 1998; 11(6): 747-58.
24. Pai TY, Tsai YP, Lo HM, Tsai CH, Lin.CY. Grey and neural network prediction of suspended solids and chemical oxygen demand in hospital wastewater treatment plant effluent. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 2007; 31(10): 1272-81.
25. El-Din AG, Smith DW. A neural network model to predict the wastewater inflow incorporating rainfall events. Water Res 2002; 36(5): 1115-26.
26. Zhang, Q, Stanley SJ. Real-time water treatment process control with artificial neural networks. Journal of Environmental Engineering 1999; 125(2): 153-60.
27. Zhang, Q, Stanley SJ. Forecasting raw-water quality parameters for the North Saskatchewan River by neural network modeling. Water Res 1997; 31(9): 2340-50.
28. Lamrini B, Benhammou A, Le Lann MV, Karama A. A neural software sensor for online prediction of coagulant dosage in a drinking water treatment plant. Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control 2005; 27(3): 195-213.