Journal of Advances in Environmental Health Research

Journal of Advances in Environmental Health Research

Process Optimization and Modeling of Tuna Canning Wastewater Treatment Plant Using GPS-X Software: A Full- Scale Case Studyg

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
Yalda Amiri Tavasoli 1
Nasser Mehrdadi 2
Ghulamreza Nabi Bidhandi 2
Farshad Golbabaei Kootenaei 3
1 PhD Candidate of Environmental Engineering, Kish International Campus, University of Tehran, Kish, Iran
2 Dept of Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Environment, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
3 Dept of Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran
10.34172/jaehr.1419
Abstract
Background: Wastewater treatment from fish processing industries presents major environmental challenges because of high effluent volume, salinity, and complex organic compounds like fats, proteins, nitrogen, and phosphorus. Efficient treatment plant design requires advanced modeling and simulation to enhance pollutant removal and minimize operational costs.
Methods: This study was conducted at the Bandar Abbas tuna canning factory. Wastewater quality data, treatment plant specifications, and previous studies were collected. The treatment process was simulated and optimized using GPS-X software based on the ASM2d biological model. The base model was calibrated and validated, and various operational scenarios, including adjustments to sludge return rate, waste activated sludge discharge, hydraulic retention time, and mixed liquor suspended solids concentration, were evaluated.
Results: Simulation under optimized conditions markedly improved pollutant removal. COD, BOD5, and TSS decreased by 98.46, 99.25, and 98.52%, respectively, approaching national standards. Total nitrogen, ammonia, and phosphorus were reduced by 93, 97, and 80%. Sensitivity analysis revealed that sludge return rate, waste sludge discharge, hydraulic retention time, and activated sludge concentration most strongly influenced effluent quality.
Conclusion: Dynamic simulation with GPS-X accurately predicted treatment plant behavior, optimized performance, and reduced energy and sludge production. Overall, the study demonstrates that mathematical modeling and scenario optimization are powerful tools for improving fish processing wastewater treatment efficiency and achieving environmental compliance.
Keywords
Wastewater treatment
Dynamic simulation
Process optimization
MLE process
GPS-X software
Fish canning industry

Subjects

1.       Wondim TT, Dzwairo RB, Aklog D, Janka E, Samarakoon G. Enhancing textile wastewater treatment performance: optimization and troubleshooting (decision support) via GPS-X model. Processes. 2023;11(10):2995. doi: 10.3390/pr11102995
2.       Kato S, Kansha Y. Comprehensive review of industrial wastewater treatment techniques. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2024;31(39):51064-97. doi: 10.1007/s11356-024-34584-0
3.       Katsara A, Coughlan NE, Jansen MAK. Characterization of seafood processing wastewater: processing procedures and physicochemical variability. Environ Pollut. 2025;383:126761. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2025.126761
4.       Hang TT, Phat VV, Hanh HH, Le Luu T, Thuan TH, Van Tuyen N, et al. Improving organic and nutrient removal efficiencies in seafood processing wastewater using anaerobic membrane bioreactor (AnMBR) integrates with anoxic/oxic (AO) processes. Sci Total Environ. 2024;954:176192. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.176192
5.       Venugopal V, Sasidharan A. Seafood industry effluents: environmental hazards, treatment and resource recovery. J Environ Chem Eng. 2021;9(2):104758. doi: 10.1016/j.jece.2020.104758
6.       Al-Dawery SK, Al-Yaqoubi GE, Al-Musharrafi AA, Harharah HN, Amari A, Harharah RH. Treatment of fish-processing wastewater using polyelectrolyte and palm anguish. Processes. 2023;11(7):2124. doi: 10.3390/pr11072124
7.       Feizi R, Kazemi Z, Kazemi Z, Jorfi S, Reshadatian N, Jaafarzadeh N. A review on efficient technologies for fish canning wastewater treatment. Desalin Water Treat. 2024;317:100220. doi: 10.1016/j.dwt.2024.100220
8.       Jasim NA. The design for wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) with GPS X modelling. Cogent Eng. 2020;7(1):1723782. doi: 10.1080/23311916.2020.1723782
9.       Mirian SM, Ebrahimi A. Optimization of wastewater treatment plant by activated sludge method using GPS-X software. J Health Syst Res. 2023;19(2):117-25. doi: 10.48305/jhsr.v19i2.1494. [Persian].
10.   Fadaei Tehrani MR, Irajpoor M, Seyedbarzani M. Optimizing wastewater treatment efficiency at north Esfahan WWTP using GPS-X simulation: enhancing aeration strategies. J Water Wastewater. 2025;35(6):1-19. doi: 10.22093/wwj.2025.497884.3456. [Persian].
11.   Elachola FF. Analysis and simulation of waste water treatment plant by using GPS-X software. Int J Res Appl Sci Eng Technol. 2022;10(6):3493-5. doi: 10.22214/ijraset.2022.44688
12.   Sadri Moghaddam S, Pirali MR. Modeling and calibration of a full-scale wastewater treatment plant using GPS-X model (a case study of Tehran). Numer Methods Civ Eng. 2021;5(4):67-76. doi: 10.52547/nmce.5.4.67
13.   Hosseini M, Majidi S. Modeling and comparison of the modified Ludzack–Ettinger process with septic tank integration for wastewater treatment in small communities using GPS-X. Int J Environ Health Eng. 2025;14(3):20. doi: 10.4103/ijehe.ijehe_22_24
14.   Chen KL, Hou CW, Liu CW, Wang HY. Improving the operational performance of a wastewater treatment plant by using GPS-X simulations: a case study in northern Taiwan. Sustain Environ Res. 2025;35(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s42834-025-00245-1
15.   Faris AM, Zwain HM, Hosseinzadeh M, Siadatmousavi SM. Modeling of novel processes for eliminating sidestreams impacts on full-scale sewage treatment plant using GPS-X7. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):2986. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-07071-0
16.   Tiar SM, Bessedik M, Abdelbaki C, ElSayed NB, Badraoui A, Slimani A, et al. Steady-state and dynamic simulation for wastewater treatment plant management: case study of Maghnia city, north-west Algeria. Water. 2024;16(2):269. doi: 10.3390/w16020269
17.   Khudhair DN, Zwain HM, Siadatmousavi SM, Hosseinzadeh M. Sensitivity analysis of operational parameters on excess sludge reduction in moving bed biofilm reactor (MBBR) system upgraded to integrated fixed film activated sludge (IFAS) process based on GPS-X environment. Water Environ Res. 2025;97(6):e70084. doi: 10.1002/wer.70084
18.   Mu’azu ND, Alagha O, Anil I. Systematic modeling of municipal wastewater activated sludge process and treatment plant capacity analysis using GPS-X. Sustainability. 2020;12(19):8182. doi: 10.3390/su12198182
19.   Odeibat AS, Mohammad R, Abu-Zreig M. Integrated environmental management and GPS-X modelling for current and future sustainable wastewater treatment: a case study from the Middle East. Heliyon. 2024;10(14):e34164. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e34164
20.   The Cadmus Group LLC. Nutrient Control Design Manual. Cincinnati, OH: United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, National Risk Management Research Laboratory; 2010. Available from: https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2019-08/documents/nutrient_control_design_manual.pdf.
21.   Luo B, Liu Y, Huang Y, Huang W, Chen Q, Yan Y, et al. Study on high-concentration activated sludge system for energy-efficient nitrogen removal in wastewater. Sustain Environ Res. 2025;35(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s42834-025-00254-0
22.   Kawan JA, Suja F, Pramanik SK, Yusof A, Abdul Rahman R, Abu Hasan H. Effect of hydraulic retention time on the performance of a compact moving bed biofilm reactor for effluent polishing of treated sewage. Water. 2022;14(1):81. doi: 10.3390/w14010081
23.   Mensah L, Petrie B, Scrimshaw M, Cartmell E, Fletton M, Campo P. Influence of solids and hydraulic retention times on microbial diversity and removal of estrogens and nonylphenols in a pilot-scale activated sludge plant. Heliyon. 2023;9(9):e19461. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19461
24.   Lago A, Greses S, Aboudi K, Moreno I, González-Fernández C. Effect of decoupling hydraulic and solid retention times on carbohydrate-rich residue valorization into carboxylic acids. Sci Rep. 2023;13(1):20590. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-48097-2
25.   Li T, Yang P, Yan J, Chen M, You S, Bai J, et al. Effects of hydraulic retention time on removal of Cr(VI) and p-chlorophenol and electricity generation in L. hexandra-planted constructed wetland-microbial fuel cell. Molecules. 2024;29(19):4773. doi: 10.3390/molecules29194773
26.   Hossain S, Chow CWK, Cook D, Sawade E, Hewa GA. Review of nitrification monitoring and control strategies in drinking water system. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(7):4003. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19074003
27.   Preisner M, Smol M. Investigating phosphorus loads removed by chemical and biological methods in municipal wastewater treatment plants in Poland. J Environ Manage. 2022;322:116058. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116058
28.   Li Y, Wu J, Liu Y, Chen F, Guan J, Shao Y, et al. The effect of sludge retention time (SRT) on the Nitrifier typical kinetics at ambient temperature under the low ammonia density. Water Sci Technol. 2022;85(2):617-32. doi: 10.2166/wst.2021.624
Journal of Advances in Environmental Health Research
Volume 13, Issue 4
Autumn 2025
Pages 265-278