Journal of Advances in Environmental Health Research

Journal of Advances in Environmental Health Research

Ensuring Safety and Sustainability: HSE Guidelines for Ship Breaking

Document Type : Review Article(s)

Authors
Ramin Maleki 1
Hamid Moaieri 2
1 Department of Environmental Health Engineering, School of Public Health, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2 Imam Khomeini Marine Science, Noshahr, Iran
10.34172/jaehr.1400
Abstract
Background: The ship breaking industry plays a crucial role in the global supply chain by recycling valuable materials from decommissioned vessels, yet it is fraught with significant health, safety, and environmental (HSE) challenges.
Methods: This study analyzed key HSE guidelines and presents case studies from major ship-breaking nations, focusing on minimizing environmental impact and enhancing worker safety. It provides a comprehensive overview of essential HSE frameworks to support the safe and sustainable operation of ship breaking facilities.
Results: The analysis identifies major risks in ship dismantling operations, including exposure to hazardous substances, physical injuries, and environmental contamination. It marks the importance of continuous monitoring and the dynamic adaptation of safety protocols to meet evolving industry challenges. Case studies from leading ship recycling nations illustrate the successful implementation of international HSE standards, showcasing tangible improvements in safety outcomes and environmental performance. Environmental considerations are emphasized, particularly regarding effective waste management and pollution control. The study also underlines the role of transparency and environmental reporting in aligning ship breaking practices with global compliance expectations.
Conclusion: By offering a detailed roadmap for HSE compliance and continuous improvement, this article serves as a valuable resource for industry stakeholders. It aims to elevate operational standards in ship breaking, enabling the sector to meet the demands of a growing global fleet while protecting human health and the environment.
Keywords
Ship breaking
HSE
Waste management
Health

Subjects

  1. Galley M. Shipbreaking: Hazards and Liabilities. Springer; 2014.
  2. Uddin MK, Nobi MN, Islam ANM. Environmental hazards and health rights of workers in shipbreaking in Bangladesh. Int J Hum Rights Healthc. 2024;17(3):300-14. doi: 1108/ijhrh-03-2022-0014.
  3. Sarraf M, Stuer-Lauridsen F, Dyoulgerov M, Bloch R, Wingfield S, Watkinson R. The Ship Breaking and Recycling Industry in Bangladesh and Pakistan. Washington, DC: The World Bank; 2010.
  4. Du Z, Zhu H, Zhou Q, Wong YD. Challenges and solutions for ship recycling in China. Ocean Eng. 2017;137:429-39. doi: 1016/j.oceaneng.2017.04.004.
  5. Dewan C, Sibilia EA. Global containments and local leakages: structural violence and the toxic flows of shipbreaking. Environ Plan C. 2024;42(1):80-101. doi: 1177/23996544231208202.
  6. Hossain MS, Fakhruddin AN, Chowdhury MA, Gan SH. Impact of ship-breaking activities on the coastal environment of Bangladesh and a management system for its sustainability. Environ Sci Policy. 2016;60:84-94.
  7. Akamangwa N. Working for the environment and against safety: how compliance affects health and safety on board ships. Saf Sci. 2016;87:131-43. doi: 1016/j.ssci.2016.03.027.
  8. Rizvi MJ, Islam MR, Adekola O, Margaret ON. A sustainable shipbreaking approach for cleaner environment and better wellbeing. J Clean Prod. 2020;270:122522. doi: 1016/j.jclepro.2020.122522.
  9. Andersen AB. Worker Safety in the Ship-Breaking Industries. Geneva: International Labour Office; 2001.
  10. Fakhruddin AN, Talukdar MI, Hossain MA. Environmental impacts of ship breaking and recycling industry of Sitakunda, Chittagong, Bangladesh. Adv Nat Sci. 2015;8(1):51-8. doi: 3968/6492.
  11. Wu WT, Lin YJ, Shiue HS, Li CY, Tsai PJ, Yang CY, et al. Cancer incidence of Taiwanese shipbreaking workers who have been potentially exposed to asbestos. Environ Res. 2014;132:370-8. doi: 1016/j.envres.2014.04.026.
  12. Wu WT, Lin YJ, Yang YH, Yang CY, Hsu JH, Wu TN. Mortality among ship-breaking workers—a retrospective cohort study. Epidemiology. 2011;22(1):S110. doi: 1097/01.ede.0000392005.94355.21.
  13. Sahu G. Challenges for the Implementation of Workers’ Rights in Hazardous Industries: A Critical Analysis of Alang-Sosiya Ship Breaking Yard, Bhavnagar, Gujarat from 1983-2013. Deonar: National Human Rights Commission; 2014.
  14. Chowdhury PA, Ali MM, Shahjahan AT. Impacts of Ship Breaking Industries on Environment and Socio-Economic Condition of Bangladesh-A Case Study of Sitakunda Shitolpur Ship Breaking Yard, Chittagong [dissertation]. Chittagong: Chittagong University of Engineering & Technology; 2015.
  15. Du Z, Zhang S, Zhou Q, Yuen KF, Wong YD. Hazardous materials analysis and disposal procedures during ship recycling. Resour Conserv Recycl. 2018;131:158-71. doi: 1016/j.resconrec.2018.01.006.
  16. Gazzola G. Shipbreaking in the Indian Subcontinent-Practices, Consequences and Applicable Legislation [dissertation]. Università Ca’ Foscari Venezia; 2022.
  17. Neşer G, Ünsalan D, Tekoğul N, Stuer-Lauridsen F. The shipbreaking industry in Turkey: environmental, safety and health issues. J Clean Prod. 2008;16(3):350-8. doi: 1016/j.jclepro.2006.08.018.
  18. Tanha M. Adoption of H&S Practices in Shipbreaking Operations: An Empirical Investigation of Shipbreaking Industry in Bangladesh [dissertation]. University of Canterbury; 2021.
  19. Mutahi SW. Invigorating Kenya’s Absorptive Capacity for Health, Safety and Environmental Technology in the Upstream Petroleum Sector [dissertation]. Strathmore University; 2020.
  20. Pasha M, Mahmood AH, Rahman I, Hasnat A. Assessment of ship breaking and recycling industries in Bangladesh—an effective step towards the achievement of environmental sustainability. In: International Conference on Agricultural, Environment and Biological Sciences (ICAEBS’2012); 2012; Phuket.
  21. Shameem KA. The Role of the Ship Breaking Industry in Bangladesh and its Future with Special Emphasis on Capacity Building Through Education and Training [dissertation]. World Maritime University; 2012.
  22. Jain KP, Pruyn J, Hopman H. Strategic guidance based on the concept of cleaner production to improve the ship recycling industry. Environ Syst Decis. 2018;38(2):250-60. doi: 1007/s10669-017-9654-5.
  23. Idoko DO, Agaba JA, Ijeoma N, Badu SG, Ijiga AC, Okereke EK. The role of HSE risk assessments in mitigating occupational hazards and infectious disease spread: a public health review. Open Access Res J Biol Pharm. 2024;11(2):11-30. doi: 53022/oarjbp.2024.11.2.0029.
  24. Atomic Energy Regulatory Board (AERB). Personal Protective Equipment. Mumbai: AERB; 2004.
  25. Mansdorf SZ. Personal protective equipment (PPE). In: Applications and Computational Elements of Industrial Hygiene. CRC Press; 2018. p. 583-627.
  26. Baalisampang T, Abbassi R, Garaniya V, Khan F, Dadashzadeh M. Review and analysis of fire and explosion accidents in maritime transportation. Ocean Eng. 2018;158:350-66. doi: 1016/j.oceaneng.2018.04.022.
  27. Paik JK. Ship-Shaped Offshore Installations: Design, Construction, Operation, Healthcare and Decommissioning. Cambridge University Press; 2022.
  28. Senavirathna GR, Galappaththi UI, Ranjan MT. A review of end-life management options for marine structures: state of the art, industrial voids, research gaps and strategies for sustainability. Clean Eng Technol. 2022;8:100489. doi: 1016/j.clet.2022.100489.
  29. Chaîneau CH, Bourguignon JC, Goubard G, Bang P, Jean P, Lefebvre B, et al. Decommissioning of a FSO containing hazardous waste: a successful story. In: International Conference on Health, Safety and Environment in Oil and Gas Exploration and Production. Perth, Australia: SPE; 2012. doi: 2118/157017-ms.
  30. Hadjiyianni I, Pouikli K. End-of-life ships as hazardous waste under the Basel Convention and the EU Waste Shipment Regulation. In: The Regulatory Landscape of Ship Recycling. Edward Elgar Publishing; 2024. p. 122-64. doi: 4337/9781035314683.00012.
  31. Misra V, Pandey SD. Hazardous waste, impact on health and environment for development of better waste management strategies in future in India. Environ Int. 2005;31(3):417-31. doi: 1016/j.envint.2004.08.005.
  32. Khanam Z, Sultana FM, Mushtaq F. Environmental pollution control measures and strategies: an overview of recent developments. In: Geospatial Analytics for Environmental Pollution Modeling: Analysis, Control and Management. Cham: Springer; 2023. p. 385-414. doi: 1007/978-3-031-45300-7_15.
  33. Stedmon CA, Seredyńska-Sobecka B, Boe-Hansen R, Le Tallec N, Waul CK, Arvin E. A potential approach for monitoring drinking water quality from groundwater systems using organic matter fluorescence as an early warning for contamination events. Water Res. 2011;45(18):6030-8. doi: 1016/j.watres.2011.08.066.
  34. Erickson PA. Emergency Response Planning: For Corporate and Municipal Managers. Elsevier; 1999.
  35. Ahmed I. Ungovernable ships at the end of their lives and the response of the Hong Kong convention: a critical appraisal of the treaty on ship-breaking from the perspective of south Asian ship-breaking nations. Santa Clara J Int Law. 2020;18:124-74.
  36. Hackett DP. Assessment of the Basel convention on the control of transboundary movements of hazardous wastes and their disposal. Am Univ Int Law Rev. 1989;5(2):291-323.
  37. Ahmed I. The Basel convention on the control of transboundary movements of hazardous wastes and their disposal: a legal misfit in global ship recycling jurisprudence. Washington Int Law J. 2019;29(2):411-54.
  38. Trifoni C. Framework of ISO 14000 on Shipping of Hazardous Cargoes [dissertation]. University of Piraeus; 2019.
  39. Balkin R. The international maritime organization and maritime security. Tulane Maritime Law Journal. 2006;30(1-2):1-34.
  40. Ali MA. The International Labor Organization for minimum labor standards: the seafarers’ case. In: Lewin D, Kaufman BE, Gollan PJ, eds. Advances in Industrial and Labor Relations. Vol 18. Emerald Group Publishing Limited; 2011. p. 215-61. doi: 1108/s0742-6186(2011)0000018010.
  41. Hsuan J, Parisi C. Mapping the supply chain of ship recycling. Mar Policy. 2020;118:103979. doi: 1016/j.marpol.2020.103979.
  42. Togo K. Japan’s Foreign Policy, 1945-2009. Leiden: Brill; 2010.
  43. Hiremath AM, Pandey SK, Asolekar SR. Development of ship-specific recycling plan to improve health safety and environment in ship recycling yards. J Clean Prod. 2016;116:279-98. doi: 1016/j.jclepro.2016.01.006.
  44. Mikelis N. Ship recycling. In: Psaraftis HN, ed. Sustainable Shipping: A Cross-Disciplinary View. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2019. p. 203-48. doi: 1007/978-3-030-04330-8_6.
  45. Sejan SS, Muhfuz MI, Urmi US. A critical analysis of legal regime of ship-breaking and ship-recycling in Bangladesh. J Environ Law Policy. 2024;4(1):54-83. doi: 33002/jelp040103.
  46. ElMenshawy OM, Ülkü MA, Hsuan J. Navigating green ship recycling: a systematic review and implications for circularity and sustainable development. Sustainability. 2024;16(17):7407. doi: 3390/su16177407.
  47. ElMenshawy O. Sailing Towards Sustainable Supply Chains: A Multi-Objective Optimization Model for Green Ship Recycling in a Circular Economy [dissertation]. Halifax, Nova Scotia: Dalhousie University; 2023.
  48. Bleischwitz R, Höller J, Kriegl M. Ship recycling—estimating future stocks and readiness for green steel transformation. Environ Res Lett. 2023;18(12):124034. doi: 1088/1748-9326/ad0a55.
  49. Skerritt DJ. Seeking clarity on transparency in fisheries governance and management. Mar Policy. 2024;165:106221. doi: 1016/j.marpol.2024.106221.
  50. Munim ZH. Autonomous ships: a review, innovative applications and future maritime business models. Supply Chain Forum. 2019;20(4):266-79. doi: 1080/16258312.2019.1631714.
Journal of Advances in Environmental Health Research
Volume 13, Issue 3
Summer 2025
Pages 168-175