Journal of Advances in Environmental Health Research

Journal of Advances in Environmental Health Research

Cadmium Sulfide-Modified Carbon Nitride/Graphite for Photocatalytic Removal of Sulfamethoxazole From Aqueous Solutions

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 Department of Environmental Health Engineering, School of Public Health, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2 Research Center for Environmental Health Technology, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
3 Department of Environmental Health Engineering, School of Health, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
4 Department of Environmental Health Engineering, School of Health, Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, Kurdistan, Iran
10.34172/jaehr.1392
Abstract
Background: Sulfamethoxazole  (SMX), a sulfonamide antibiotic, is frequently detected at high concentrations in surface and drinking water, indicating widespread contamination.
Methods: In this experimental study, a graphitic carbon nitride (g-C3N4)/cadmium sulfide (CdS) nano-composite was synthesized using a co-precipitation method. The crystal structure, morphology, and surface chemistry of the synthesized nanocomposite were characterized using X-ray powder diffraction (XRD), field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM), and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX), respectively. The Experiments were conducted under varying conditions, including pH (3–11), nanocatalyst dosage (0.2–1 g/L), contact time (0–120 minutes), and initial SMX concentration (5–20 mg/L).
Results: XRD and SEM analyses confirmed the hexagonal structure of CdS, with SEM images showing well-dispersed nanoparticles and no agglomeration. The distinct peaks in the XRD pattern indicated well-crystallized CdS nanoparticles. Optimal removal efficiency was achieved at pH 5, with a nanocatalyst dosage of 0.7 g/L, a contact time of 60 minutes, and an SMX concentration of 5 mg/L. Kinetic studies revealed that the photocatalytic degradation followed first-order kinetics (R2 = 0.9955).
Conclusion: Based on the results and the physical and chemical properties of the synthesized CdS-modified carbon nitride nanocomposite, this photocatalytic process offers a promising, effective, and efficient method for the treatment of antibiotic-contaminated wastewater, particularly for removing SMX.
Keywords

Subjects


  1. Browne AJ, Chipeta MG, Haines-Woodhouse G, Kumaran EP, Hamadani BH, Zaraa S, et al. Global antibiotic consumption and usage in humans, 2000-18: a spatial modelling study. Lancet Planet Health. 2021;5(12):e893-904. doi: 1016/s2542-5196(21)00280-1.
  2. Llor C, Bjerrum L. Antimicrobial resistance: risk associated with antibiotic overuse and initiatives to reduce the problem. Ther Adv Drug Saf. 2014;5(6):229-41. doi: 1177/2042098614554919.
  3. Hoseinzadeh E, Alikhani MY, Samargandi MR. Evaluation of synergistic effect of commercial zinc oxide and copper oxide nanoparticles against gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria by fraction inhibitory concentration index. J Adv Med Biomed Res. 2012;20(82):29-41. [Persian].
  4. Hoseinzadeh E, Samargandi MR, Alikhani MY, Godini H, Shams Khorramabadi G. Sensitivity coefficient and death kinetics of Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus to zinc oxide and copper oxide nanoparticles. J Isfahan Med Sch. 2012;30(200):1153-63. [Persian].
  5. Kraemer SA, Ramachandran A, Perron GG. Antibiotic pollution in the environment: from microbial ecology to public policy. Microorganisms. 2019;7(6):180. doi: 3390/microorganisms7060180.
  6. de Ilurdoz MS, Sadhwani JJ, Reboso JV. Antibiotic removal processes from water & wastewater for the protection of the aquatic environment - a review. J Water Process Eng. 2022;45:102474. doi: 1016/j.jwpe.2021.102474.
  7. Shi J, Dong Y, Shi Y, Yin T, He W, An T, et al. Groundwater antibiotics and microplastics in a drinking-water source area, northern China: occurrence, spatial distribution, risk assessment, and correlation. Environ Res. 2022;210:112855. doi: 1016/j.envres.2022.112855.
  8. Popoola BM, Ogwerel JP, Oladipo OG. Bacterial isolates from drinking water river sources exhibit multi-drug resistant trait. Environ Monit Assess. 2024;196(11):1054. doi: 1007/s10661-024-13117-9.
  9. Ovung A, Bhattacharyya J. Sulfonamide drugs: structure, antibacterial property, toxicity, and biophysical interactions. Biophys Rev. 2021;13(2):259-72. doi: 1007/s12551-021-00795-9.
  10. Zuo R, Liu X, Zhang Q, Wang J, Yang J, Teng Y, et al. Sulfonamide antibiotics in groundwater and their migration in the vadose zone: a case in a drinking water resource. Ecol Eng. 2021;162:106175. doi: 1016/j.ecoleng.2021.106175.
  11. Sodhi KK, Kumar M, Balan B, Dhaulaniya AS, Shree P, Sharma N, et al. Perspectives on the antibiotic contamination, resistance, metabolomics, and systemic remediation. SN Appl Sci. 2021;3(2):269. doi: 1007/s42452-020-04003-3.
  12. Plaisance A, Wayment D, Raje H, Boopathy R. Biodegradation of sulfamethoxazole by a bacterium isolated from the Hurricane overtop sediments. Bioresour Technol Rep. 2024;27:101926. doi: 1016/j.biteb.2024.101926.
  13. Xu D, Xie Y, Li J. Toxic effects and molecular mechanisms of sulfamethoxazole on Scenedesmus obliquus. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2022;232:113258. doi: 1016/j.ecoenv.2022.113258.
  14. Samrot AV, Wilson S, Sanjay Preeth RS, Prakash P, Sathiyasree M, Saigeetha S, et al. Sources of antibiotic contamination in wastewater and approaches to their removal—an overview. Sustainability. 2023;15(16):12639. doi: 3390/su151612639.
  15. Olasupo A, Ahmed N, Wan Ahmad Kamil WM, Mohd Suah FB. Enhanced removal of sulfamethoxazole antibiotics from aquatic samples by electromembrane extraction process. React Funct Polym. 2022;173:105211. doi: 1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2022.105211.
  16. Nhoysaykham M, Wu X, Lin Y, Wu S, Li X, Yang C. Efficient removal of antibiotic from aqueous solutions using adsorbent derived from zeolitic imidazolate framework-8. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp. 2024;684:133114. doi: 1016/j.colsurfa.2023.133114.
  17. Zulfiqar N, Nadeem R, Musaimi OA. Photocatalytic degradation of antibiotics via exploitation of a magnetic nanocomposite: a green nanotechnology approach toward drug-contaminated wastewater reclamation. ACS Omega. 2024;9(7):7986-8004. doi: 1021/acsomega.3c08116.
  18. Wang J, Song J, Zhou Q. In situ-growth of Fe2S3 ultrathin layer on CdS nanorod through cation-exchange for efficient photocatalytic degradation of organic pollutants under visible light coupled oxidant activation. Desalin Water Treat. 2024;319:100434. doi: 1016/j.dwt.2024.100434.
  19. Yang Z, Yang J, Li L, Cao W, Zhang J, Zhao H, et al. A novel F-BiVO4/g-C3N4/CdS dual S-scheme heterojunction for high-efficient photocatalytic removal of multiple pollutants. Appl Surf Sci. 2024;672:160738. doi: 1016/j.apsusc.2024.160738.
  20. Hu H, He Y, Wang X, Zhang T, Li D, Sun M, et al. An intermediary route to CdS/Bi2S3 architectures with high-activity and stability in photocatalytic water splitting and dye degradation. Mater Sci Eng B. 2024;305:117431. doi: 1016/j.mseb.2024.117431.
  21. Li YH, Tang ZR, Xu YJ. Multifunctional graphene-based composite photocatalysts oriented by multifaced roles of graphene in photocatalysis. Chin J Catal. 2022;43(3):708-30. doi: 1016/s1872-2067(21)63871-8.
  22. Muhmood T, Ahmad I, Haider Z, Haider SK, Shahzadi N, Aftab A, et al. Graphene-like graphitic carbon nitride (g-C3N4) as a semiconductor photocatalyst: properties, classification, and defects engineering approaches. Mater Today Sustain. 2024;25:100633. doi: 1016/j.mtsust.2023.100633.
  23. Bhanderi D, Lakhani P, Modi CK. Graphitic carbon nitride (g-C3N4) as an emerging photocatalyst for sustainable environmental applications: a comprehensive review. RSC Sustain. 2024;2(2):265-87. doi: 1039/d3su00382e.
  24. Zubair M, Vanhaecke EM, Svenum IH, Rønning M, Yang J. Core-shell particles of C-doped CdS and graphene: a noble metal-free approach for efficient photocatalytic H2 generation. Green Energy Environ. 2020;5(4):461-72. doi: 1016/j.gee.2020.10.017.
  25. Liang X, Wang G, Huo T, Dong X, Wang G, Ma H, et al. Band structure modification of g-C3N4 for efficient heterojunction construction and enhanced photocatalytic capability under visible light irradiation. Catal Commun. 2019;123:44-8. doi: 1016/j.catcom.2019.01.003.
  26. National Center for Biotechnology Information. PubChem Compound Summary for CID 5329, Sulfamethoxazole. 2024. Available from: https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/Sulfamethoxazole. Retrieved November 18, 2024.
  27. Garg R, Gupta R, Bansal A. Synthesis of g-C3N4/ZnO nanocomposite for photocatalytic degradation of a refractory organic endocrine disrupter. Mater Today Proc. 2021;44(Pt 1):855-9. doi: 1016/j.matpr.2020.10.787.
  28. Afzal MI, Shahid S, Mansoor S, Javed M, Iqbal S, Hakami O, et al. Fabrication of a ternary nanocomposite g-C3N4/Cu@CdS with superior charge separation for removal of organic pollutants and bacterial disinfection from wastewater under sunlight illumination. Toxics. 2022;10(11):657. doi: 3390/toxics10110657.
  29. Hoseinzadeh E, Wei C, Farzadkia M, Rezaee A. Effects of low frequency-low voltage alternating electric current on apoptosis progression in bioelectrical reactor biofilm. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2020;8:2. doi: 3389/fbioe.2020.00002.
  30. Hoseinzadeh E, Alikhani MY, Samarghandi MR, Shirzad-Siboni M. Antimicrobial potential of synthesized zinc oxide nanoparticles against gram positive and gram-negative bacteria. Desalin Water Treat. 2014;52(25-27):4969-76. doi: 1080/19443994.2013.810356.
  31. Balyejjusa S, Adome RO, Musoke D. Spectrophotometric determination of sulphamethoxazole and trimethoprim (co-trimoxazole) in binary mixtures and in tablets. Afr Health Sci. 2002;2(2):56-62.
  32. Fu J, Chang B, Tian Y, Xi F, Dong X. Novel C3N4–CdS composite photocatalysts with organic–inorganic heterojunctions: in situ synthesis, exceptional activity, high stability and photocatalytic mechanism. J Mater Chem A. 2013;1(9):3083-90. doi: 1039/c2ta00672c.
  33. Chen L, Xu Y, Chen B. In situ photochemical fabrication of CdS/g-C3N4 nanocomposites with high performance for hydrogen evolution under visible light. Appl Catal B Environ. 2019;256:117848. doi: 1016/j.apcatb.2019.117848.
  34. Sapińska D, Adamek E, Masternak E, Zielińska-Danch W, Baran W. Influence of pH on the kinetics and products of photocatalytic degradation of sulfonamides in aqueous solutions. Toxics. 2022;10(11):655. doi: 3390/toxics10110655.
  35. Song Y, Tian J, Gao S, Shao P, Qi J, Cui F. Photodegradation of sulfonamides by g-C3N4 under visible light irradiation: effectiveness, mechanism and pathways. Appl Catal B Environ. 2017;210:88-96. doi: 1016/j.apcatb.2017.03.059.
  36. Wang L, Wang Y, Wang Y, Wang H, Wu H, Gao D. Efficient photocatalytic degradation of sulfonamides in wastewater using g-C3N4 heterostructures: a critical review. Environ Technol Innov. 2024;36:103854. doi: 1016/j.eti.2024.103854.
  37. Boreen AL, Arnold WA, McNeill K. Photochemical fate of sulfa drugs in the aquatic environment: sulfa drugs containing five-membered heterocyclic groups. Environ Sci Technol. 2004;38(14):3933-40. doi: 1021/es0353053.
  38. Ioannidou E, Frontistis Z, Antonopoulou M, Venieri D, Konstantinou I, Kondarides DI, et al. Solar photocatalytic degradation of sulfamethoxazole over tungsten–modified TiO2. Chem Eng J. 2017;318:143-52. doi: 1016/j.cej.2016.06.012.
  39. Khataee A, Darvishi Cheshmeh Soltani R, Hanifehpour Y, Safarpour M, Gholipour Ranjbar H, Joo SW. Synthesis and characterization of dysprosium-doped ZnO nanoparticles for photocatalysis of a textile dye under visible light irradiation. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2014;53(5):1924-32. doi: 1021/ie402743u.
  40. Anandan S, Kathiravan K, Murugesan V, Ikuma Y. Anionic (IO3-) non-metal doped TiO2 nanoparticles for the photocatalytic degradation of hazardous pollutant in water. Catal Commun. 2009;10(6):1014-9. doi: 1016/j.catcom.2008.12.054.
  41. Sarafraz M, Sadeghi M, Yazdanbakhsh A, Amini MM, Sadani M, Eslami A. Enhanced photocatalytic degradation of ciprofloxacin by black Ti3 + /N-TiO2 under visible LED light irradiation: kinetic, energy consumption, degradation pathway, and toxicity assessment. Process Saf Environ Prot. 2020;137:261-72. doi: 1016/j.psep.2020.02.030.
  42. Mahmoodi F, Jalilzadeh Yengejeh R, Tirgir F, Sadeghi M. Removal of 1-naphthol from water via photocatalytic degradation over NS-TiO2/silica sulfuric acid under visible light. J Adv Environ Health Res. 2022;10(1):59-72. doi: 32598/jaehr.10.1.1242.
  43. Rezaei S, Maleki A, Rezaee R, Kashefi H, Zandsalimi Y. Enhancement of photocatalytic removal of 4-chlorophenol from aqueous solutions by manganese oxide doped ZnO nanoparticles using RSM. J Adv Environ Health Res. 2024;12(4):205-11. doi: 34172/jaehr.1365.
  44. Rapti I, Kourkouta T, Malisova EM, Albanis T, Konstantinou I. Photocatalytic degradation of inherent pharmaceutical concentration levels in real hospital WWTP effluents using g-C3N4 catalyst on CPC pilot scale reactor. Molecules. 2023;28(3):1170. doi: 3390/molecules28031170.