Journal of Advances in Environmental Health Research

Journal of Advances in Environmental Health Research

Assessing the Efficiency of Chemically Modified Biochars in Removing Nickel From Aqueous Solutions

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
Mahboub Saffari 1
Masomeh Moazallahi 2
1 Department of Environment, Institute of Science and High Technology and Environmental Sciences, Graduate University of Advanced Technology, Kerman, Iran
2 Institute of Science and High Technology and Environmental Sciences, Graduate University of Advanced Technology, Kerman, Iran
10.34172/jaehr.1361
Abstract
Background: Modification methods can significantly alter the adsorption properties of biochar by changing its structure. This study aimed to optimize the removal of Ni2 + from aqueous solutions using unmodified pristine biochar (PB) and acid-modified biochar (ACB) and alkali-modified biochar (ALB) treatments.
Methods: After producing unmodified and modified biochars, their efficacy (PB, ACB, ALB) in optimizing nickel (Ni) removal from aqueous solutions, affected by various factors including initial Ni concentration, solution pH, adsorbent dose and contact time was evaluated using the response surface methodology (RSM: Box-Behnken design).
Results: Comparative analysis employing Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) confirmed that ACB and ALB biochars exhibited an improved aromatic structure and smoother surfaces compared to PB. However, the modification process resulted in a decline in specific surface area (SSA) for ACB and ALB, consequently reducing their Ni adsorption capacity compared to PB. It was observed that acidic and alkaline treatments caused dissolution and rearrangement of biochar components, leading to a decrease in porosity and SSA. Consequently, the modified biochars demonstrated diminished effectiveness in removing Ni from solutions. Furthermore, the study revealed that pH, contact time, and adsorbent dose directly affected the Ni removal, while the initial Ni concentration exhibited an inverse effect.
Conclusions: The current study revealed that the modification of biochar does not invariably enhance its pollutant adsorption properties. Further research is needed to explore the influence of feedstock types and the specific method of biochar modification on its pollutant adsorption efficiency.
Keywords
Aqueous solutions
Modified biochars
Heavy metals
Response surface methodology
Sorption

Subjects

  1. Mishra S, Bharagava RN, More N, Yadav A, Zainith S, Mani S, et al. Heavy metal contamination: an alarming threat to environment and human health. In: Sobti RC, Arora NK, Kothari R, eds. Environmental Biotechnology: For Sustainable Future. Singapore: Springer; 2019. p. 103-25. doi: 1007/978-981-10-7284-0_5.
  2. Genchi G, Carocci A, Lauria G, Sinicropi MS, Catalano A. Nickel: human health and environmental toxicology. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(3):679. doi: 3390/ijerph17030679.
  3. Buxton S, Garman E, Heim KE, Lyons-Darden T, Schlekat CE, Taylor MD, et al. Concise review of nickel human health toxicology and ecotoxicology. Inorganics. 2019;7(7):89. doi: 3390/inorganics7070089.
  4. Yadav M, Singh G, Jadeja RN. Physical and chemical methods for heavy metal removal. In: Singh P, Singh R, Singh VK, Bhadouria R, eds. Pollutants and Water Management: Resources, Strategies and Scarcity. John Wiley & Sons; 2021. p. 377-97. doi: 1002/9781119693635.ch15.
  5. Saravanan A, Senthil Kumar P, Jeevanantham S, Karishma S, Tajsabreen B, Yaashikaa PR, et al. Effective water/wastewater treatment methodologies for toxic pollutants removal: processes and applications towards sustainable development. Chemosphere. 2021;280:130595. doi: 1016/j.chemosphere.2021.130595.
  6. Vakili M, Rafatullah M, Yuan J, Zwain HM, Mojiri A, Gholami Z, et al. Nickel ion removal from aqueous solutions through the adsorption process: a review. Rev Chem Eng. 2021;37(6):755-78. doi: 1515/revce-2019-0047.
  7. Alalwan HA, Kadhom MA, Alminshid AH. Removal of heavy metals from wastewater using agricultural byproducts. J Water Supply Res Technol AQUA. 2020;69(2):99-112. doi: 2166/aqua.2020.133.
  8. Saffari M, Moazallahi M. Comparative evaluation of nickel ions removal from aqueous solutions using hydrochar and biochar of cypress cones. Int J Glob Warm. 2022;27(3):247-70. doi: 1504/ijgw.2022.124201.
  9. Cha JS, Park SH, Jung SC, Ryu C, Jeon JK, Shin MC, et al. Production and utilization of biochar: a review. J Ind Eng Chem. 2016;40:1-15. doi: 1016/j.jiec.2016.06.002.
  10. Xiang W, Zhang X, Chen J, Zou W, He F, Hu X, et al. Biochar technology in wastewater treatment: a critical review. Chemosphere. 2020;252:126539. doi: 1016/j.chemosphere.2020.126539.
  11. Trakal L, Šigut R, Šillerová H, Faturíková D, Komárek M. Copper removal from aqueous solution using biochar: effect of chemical activation. Arab J Chem. 2014;7(1):43-52. doi: 1016/j.arabjc.2013.08.001.
  12. Trakal L. Removing of metal(loid)s from aqueous solution using biochar and its modifications. In: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Heavy Metals in the Environment. Ghent, Belgium: ICHMET; 2016.
  13. Huang WH, Lee DJ, Huang C. Modification on biochars for applications: a research update. Bioresour Technol. 2021;319:124100. doi: 1016/j.biortech.2020.124100.
  14. Ahmed MB, Zhou JL, Ngo HH, Guo W, Chen M. Progress in the preparation and application of modified biochar for improved contaminant removal from water and wastewater. Bioresour Technol. 2016;214:836-51. doi: 1016/j.biortech.2016.05.057.
  15. Vithanage M, Rajapaksha AU, Zhang M, Thiele-Bruhn S, Lee SS, Ok YS. Acid-activated biochar increased sulfamethazine retention in soils. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2015;22(3):2175-86. doi: 1007/s11356-014-3434-2.
  16. Saffari M. Response surface methodological approach for optimizing the removal of cadmium from aqueous solutions using pistachio residues biochar supported/non-supported by nanoscale zero-valent iron. Main Group Met Chem. 2018;41(5-6):167-81. doi: 1515/mgmc-2018-0011.
  17. Mahdi Z, El Hanandeh A, Yu QJ. Preparation, characterization and application of surface modified biochar from date seed for improved lead, copper, and nickel removal from aqueous solutions. J Environ Chem Eng. 2019;7(5):103379. doi: 1016/j.jece.2019.103379.
  18. Georgieva VG, Gonsalvesh L, Tavlieva MP. Thermodynamics and kinetics of the removal of nickel(II) ions from aqueous solutions by biochar adsorbent made from agro-waste walnut shells. J Mol Liq. 2020;312:112788. doi: 1016/j.molliq.2020.112788.
  19. Xu Y, Bai T, Yan Y, Zhao Y, Yuan L, Pan P, et al. Enhanced removal of hexavalent chromium by different acid-modified biochar derived from corn straw: behavior and mechanism. Water Sci Technol. 2020;81(10):2270-80. doi: 2166/wst.2020.290.
  20. Hu X, Xue Y, Long L, Zhang K. Characteristics and batch experiments of acid- and alkali-modified corncob biomass for nitrate removal from aqueous solution. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2018;25(20):19932-40. doi: 1007/s11356-018-2198-5.
  21. Liu C, Wang W, Wu R, Liu Y, Lin X, Kan H, et al. Preparation of acid- and alkali-modified biochar for removal of methylene blue pigment. ACS Omega. 2020;5(48):30906-22. doi: 1021/acsomega.0c03688.
  22. Bartczak P, Norman M, Klapiszewski Ł, Karwańska N, Kawalec M, Baczyńska M, et al. Removal of nickel(II) and lead(II) ions from aqueous solution using peat as a low-cost adsorbent: a kinetic and equilibrium study. Arab J Chem. 2018;11(8):1209-22. doi: 1016/j.arabjc.2015.07.018.
  23. Mohan D, Sarswat A, Ok YS, Pittman CU Jr. Organic and inorganic contaminants removal from water with biochar, a renewable, low cost and sustainable adsorbent--a critical review. Bioresour Technol. 2014;160:191-202. doi: 1016/j.biortech.2014.01.120.
  24. Usman A, Sallam A, Zhang M, Vithanage M, Ahmad M, Al-Farraj A, et al. Sorption process of date palm biochar for aqueous Cd(II) removal: efficiency and mechanisms. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2016;227(12):449. doi: 1007/s11270-016-3161-z.
  25. Krishnan KA, Sreejalekshmi KG, Baiju RS. Nickel(II) adsorption onto biomass based activated carbon obtained from sugarcane bagasse pith. Bioresour Technol. 2011;102(22):10239-47. doi: 1016/j.biortech.2011.08.069.
  26. Reddy DH, Ramana DK, Seshaiah K, Reddy AV. Biosorption of Ni(II) from aqueous phase by Moringa oleifera bark, a low cost biosorbent. Desalination. 2011;268(1-3):150-7. doi: 1016/j.desal.2010.10.011.
  27. Zafar MN, Abbas I, Nadeem R, Sheikh MA, Ghauri MA. Removal of nickel onto alkali treated rice bran. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2009;197(1):361-70. doi: 1007/s11270-008-9817-6.
  28. Hosseini SS, Khosravi A, Tavakoli H, Esmhosseini M, Khezri S. Natural zeolite for nickel ions removal from aqueous solutions: optimization and modeling using response surface methodology based on central composite design. Desalin Water Treat. 2016;57(36):16898-906. doi: 1080/19443994.2015.1082508.
  29. Garg UK, Kaur MP, Garg VK, Sud D. Removal of nickel(II) from aqueous solution by adsorption on agricultural waste biomass using a response surface methodological approach. Bioresour Technol. 2008;99(5):1325-31. doi: 1016/j.biortech.2007.02.011.
Journal of Advances in Environmental Health Research
Volume 12, Issue 4
Autumn 2024
Pages 246-256