Journal of Advances in Environmental Health Research

Journal of Advances in Environmental Health Research

Comparative Analysis of Environmental Sustainability and Performance Indices of Different Gas Turbine Inlet Cooling Systems

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
Enefiok Okon Usungurua 1
Imoh Ime Ekanem 2
Aniekan Essienubong Ikpe 2
1 Department of Mechanical Engineering, Federal University of Technology, Ikot Abasi, Nigeria
2 Department of Mechanical Engineering, Akwa Ibom State Polytechnics, Ikot Osurua, Ikot Ekpene, Nigeria
10.34172/jaehr.1340
Abstract
Background: A thermodynamic analysis was performed on the inlet air cooling system of a natural gas-fueled turbine at the Afam power plant in Nigeria. The objective was to identify optimal conditions for environmental sustainability, performance output, fossil fuel economy, and cost-effectiveness.
Methods: Three cooling methods were evaluated: spray cooler with wetted media, fogging system, and mechanical chiller. Energy, exergy, and exergy-economic models for both the existing and modeled turbine units were compared. The developed program source code indicated that both sustainability and performance indices improved when the turbine inlet cooling system adhered to design specifications.
Results: The refrigeration method achieved the lowest inlet temperature at 15 ℃ and a sustainability index (SI) of 2.243. The SI decreased with increasing ambient temperatures due to higher total exergetic destruction. Regarding performance indices—net turbine output, energy efficiency, and exergy efficiency—the spray cooler had the highest values at 98.845 WM, 29.05%, and 28.49% respectively. This was followed by the mechanical chiller at 100.692 WM, 29.25%, and 29.03%, and the fogging system at 98.695 WM, 29.03%, and 28.45%. The base system recorded the lowest values at 95.70 WM, 28.69%, and 27.58%, attributed to increased compressor work. Both the environmental effect factor (EEF) and waste exergy ratio (WER) decreased with rising ambient temperature due to total exergetic destruction.
conclusion: The refrigeration cooling method is recommended due to its lower inlet conditions, minimal exergy destruction, and high environmental sustainability, performance efficiency, and cost-effectiveness. Inlet-air cooling remains an efficient technique for improved performance.
 
Keywords
Gas turbine
Environmental sustainability
Performance output
Cooling systems
Techno-economy

Subjects

  1. Efe-Ononeme OE, Ikpe A, Ariavie GO. Modal analysis of conventional gas turbine blade materials (Udimet 500 and IN738) for industrial applications. J Eng Technol Appl Sci. 2018;3(2):119-33. doi: 30931/jetas.452857.
  2. Ikpe A, Efe-Ononeme OE, Ariavie GO. Thermo-structural analysis of first stage gas turbine rotor blade materials for optimum service performance. Int J Eng Appl Sci. 2018;10(2):118-30. doi: 24107/ijeas.447650.
  3. Ahmadi P, Dincer I. Thermodynamic analysis and thermoeconomic optimization of a dual pressure combined cycle power plant with a supplementary firing unit. Energy Convers Manag. 2011;52(5):2296-308. doi: 1016/j.enconman.2010.12.023.
  4. Perez-Blanco H, Kim KH, Ream S. Evaporatively-cooled compression using a high-pressure refrigerant. Appl Energy. 2007;84(10):1028-43. doi: 1016/j.apenergy.2007.02.013.
  5. Chaker M, Meher-Homji CB, Mee T III. Inlet fogging of gas turbine engines—part I: fog droplet thermodynamics, heat transfer, and practical considerations. J Eng Gas Turbines Power. 2004;126(3):545-58. doi: 1115/1.1712981.
  6. Cataldi G, Güntner H, Matz C, McKay T, Hoffmann J, Nemet A, et al. Influence of high fogging systems on gas turbine engine operation and performance. J Eng Gas Turbines Power. 2004;128(1):135-43. doi: 1115/1.1926313.
  7. Marzouk AM, Hanafi AS. Thermo-economic analysis of inlet air cooling in gas turbine plants. J Power Technol. 2013;93(2):90-9.
  8. Alhazmy MM, Jassim RK, Zaki GM. Performance enhancement of gas turbines by inlet air‐cooling in hot and humid climates. Int J Energy Res. 2006;30(10):777-97. doi: 1002/er.1184.
  9. Kim KH, Ko H-J, Kim K, Perez-Blanco H. Analysis of water droplet evaporation in a gas turbine inlet fogging process. Appl Therm Eng. 2012;33-34:62-9. doi: 1016/j.applthermaleng.2011.09.012.
  10. De Pascale A, Melino F, Morini M. Analysis of inlet air cooling for IGCC power augmentation. Energy Procedia. 2014;45:1265-74. doi: 1016/j.egypro.2014.01.132.
  11. Athari H, Soltani S, Bölükbaşi A, Rosen MA, Morosuk T. Comparative exergoeconomic analyses of the integration of biomass gasification and a gas turbine power plant with and without fogging inlet cooling. Renew Energy. 2015;76:394-400. doi: 1016/j.renene.2014.11.064.
  12. Erickson DC, Makar EE. Improving warm weather performance of the LM6000. Energy Concept to Business and Technology for the Colerbel Generator Industry. 2013. p 420.
  13. Punwani D. An Introduction to Turbine Inlet Cooling. Energy-Tech Magazine; 2003.
  14. Cortes CR, Willems D. Gas Turbine Inlet Air Cooling Techniques: An Overview of Current Technologies. Las Vegas, NV: POWER-GEN; 2003. p. 911.
  15. Al-Salman KY, Rishack QA, Al-Mousawi SJ. Parametric study of gas turbine cycle with fogging system. J Basrah Res Sci. 2007;33(4):16-30.
  16. Shepherd DW, Fraser D, Westinghouse S. Impact of Heat Rate, Emissions and Reliability from the Application of Wet Compression on Combustion Turbines. Siemens AG; 2005.
  17. Ameri M, Nabati H, Keshtgar A, editors. Gas Turbine Power Augmentation Using Fog Inlet Air-Cooling System. In: Proceedings of the ASME 7th Biennial Conference on Engineering Systems Design and Analysis. Vol 1. Manchester, England: ASME; 2004. p. 73-78. doi: 1115/esda2004-58101.
  18. Jonsson M, Yan J. Humidified gas turbines—a review of proposed and implemented cycles. Energy. 2005;30(7):1013-78. doi: 1016/j.energy.2004.08.005.
  19. Ibrahim TK, Rahman MM, Abdalla AN. Gas Turbine configuration for improving the performance of combined cycle power plant. Procedia Eng. 2011;15:4216-23. doi: 1016/j.proeng.2011.08.791.
  20. Boonnasa S, Namprakai P, Muangnapoh T. Performance improvement of the combined cycle power plant by intake air cooling using an absorption chiller. Energy. 2006;31(12):2036-46. doi: 1016/j.energy.2005.09.010.
  21. Young JB, Wilcock RC. Modeling the air-cooled gas turbine: part 1—general thermodynamics. J Turbomach. 2002;124(2):207-13. doi: 1115/1.1415037.
  22. Aliehyaei M, Tahani M, Ahmadi P, Esfandiari M. Optimization of fog inlet air cooling system for combined cycle power plants using genetic algorithm. Appl Therm Eng. 2015;76:449-61. doi: 1016/j.applthermaleng.2014.11.032.
  23. Kim KH, Perez-Blanco H. Potential of regenerative gas-turbine systems with high fogging compression. Appl Energy. 2007;84(1):16-28. doi: 1016/j.apenergy.2006.04.008.
  24. Ahmadi Boyaghchi F, Molaie H. Sensitivity analysis of exergy destruction in a real combined cycle power plant based on advanced exergy method. Energy Convers Manag. 2015;99:374-86. doi: 1016/j.enconman.2015.04.048.
  25. Ondryas IS, Wilson DA, Kawamoto M, Haub GL. Options in gas turbine power augmentation using inlet air chilling. J Eng Gas Turbines Power. 1991;113(2):203-11. doi: 1115/1.2906546.
  26. Chen Q, Han W, Zheng J-j, Sui J, Jin H-g. The exergy and energy level analysis of a combined cooling, heating and power system driven by a small-scale gas turbine at off design condition. Appl Therm Eng. 2014;66(1-2):590-602. doi: 1016/j.applthermaleng.2014.02.066.
  27. Kurzke J. Performance modeling methodology: efficiency definitions for cooled single and multistage turbines. In: Proceedings of the ASME Turbo Expo 2002: Power for Land, Sea, and Air. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: ASME; 2002. p. 85-92. doi: 1115/gt2002-30497.
  28. Bejan A, Tsatsaronis G, Moran MJ. Thermal Design and Optimization. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1995.
  29. Kotas JJ. The Exergy Method in Thermal Power Plant Analysis. Malabar: Krieger; 1995.
  30. Ikpe AE, Iluobe IC, Imonitie D. Modelling and simulation of high-pressure fogging air intake cooling unit of Omotosho phase II gas turbine power plant. J Appl Res Ind Eng. 2020;7(2):121-36. doi: 22105/jarie.2020.216680.1129.
  31. Bassily AM. Effects of evaporative inlet and aftercooling on the recuperated gas turbine cycle. Appl Therm Eng. 2001;21(18):1875-90. doi: 1016/s1359-4311(01)00054-0.
  32. Rajput RK. Thermal Engineering. 7th ed. New Delhi: Laxmi Publications; 2009.
  33. Dossat RV. Principles of Refrigeration. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1997.
  34. Jassim RK, Zaki GM, Alhazmy MM. Energy and exergy analysis of reverse Brayton refrigerator for gas turbine power boosting. Int J Exergy. 2009;6(2):143-65. doi: 1504/ijex.2009.023995.
  35. Frangopoulos CC. In: Analysis of Thermal and Energy Systems. Proceedings of the International Conference ATHENS’91. Kouremenos DA, Tsatsaronis G, Rakopoulos CD, eds. New York: ASME; 1991. p. 305-318.
  36. Aydin H. Exergetic sustainability analysis of LM6000 gas turbine power plant with steam cycle. Energy. 2013;57:766-74. doi: 1016/j.energy.2013.05.018.
  37. Cengel YA, Boles MA. Thermodynamics: An Engineering Approach. 6th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2007.
Journal of Advances in Environmental Health Research
Volume 12, Issue 3
Summer 2024
Pages 134-147