Journal of Advances in Environmental Health Research

Journal of Advances in Environmental Health Research

The Efficiency of Multi-Media Filtration in Drinking Water Treatment Plants for the Removal of Natural Organic Matter

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
Behnam Kazemi Noredinvand 1, 2, 3
Afshin Takdastan 4
Reza Jalilzadeh Yengejeh 2
Farshid Ghanbari 5
1 Department of Environmental Engineering, Khouzestan Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ahvaz, Iran.
2 Department of Environmental Engineering, Ahvaz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ahvaz, Iran.
3 Department of Environmental Engineering, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
4 4. Department of Environmental Health Engineering, Environmental Technologies Research Center, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran.
5 Department of Environmental Health Engineering, Abadan University of Medical Sciences, Abadan, Iran.
10.22102/jaehr.2021.277080.1215
Abstract
Background: Filtration is a processing unit in a Drinking Water Treatment Plant (DWTP) that is used to remove particles from the water. This study is the result of pilot-scale research on Gravity Rapid Sand Filter (GRSF). The purpose of this paper was to evaluate the performance of the Triple Media Filter (TMF) (Granular Activated Carbon (GAC) + anthracite + garnet) and Dual-Media Filter (DMF) (anthracite + sand) in the removal of Natural Organic Matter (NOM) as a precursor of Trihalomethanes (THMs) and chlorination Disinfection by-Products (DBPs). 
Methods: Filtration rate was performed at conventional (120 m/d) and a high rate (240 m/d) and compared with full-sized Single Media Filter (SMF) with a sand media. The removal efficiency of turbidity, color, and UV absorption at a wavelength of 254 nm (UV254) and Dissolved Organic Carbon (DOC) parameters were investigated. Besides, the Specific Ultraviolet Absorbance (SUVA) was calculated from the ratio of UV254 to DOC. 
Results: The results showed that the Multimedia Filter (MMF) at 120 and 240 m/d filtration rate had higher removal efficiency compared with a control SMF in removing measured parameters (p<0.05). Also, similar filters have shown the same efficiency relative to each other in different loading rates and there was an insignificant difference. 
Conclusion: MMF can significantly remove organic pollutants and control the formation of DBPs during water treatment. The study suggests that SMF should be replaced with MMF to improve water quality.
Keywords
Natural Organic Matter (NOM)
Filtration
Multi-media filter
Granular Activated Carbon (GAC)
Water treatment
Subjects
  1. Crittenden JC, Trussell RR, Hand DW, Howe KJ, Tchobanoglous G. MWH’s water treatment: Principles and design. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons; 2012. [DOI:10.1002/9781118131473]
  2. Jeong S, Sathasivan A, Kastl G, Shim WG, Vigneswaran S. Experimental investigation and modeling of dissolved organic carbon removal by coagulation from seawater. Chemosphere. 2014; 95:310-6. [DOI:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.09.022][PMID]
  3. Richardson SD, Postigo C. Drinking water disinfection by-products. In: Barceló D, editors. Emerging Organic Contaminants and Human Health. The Handbook of Environmental Chemistry. Vol. 20. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer; 2011. pp 93-137. [DOI:10.1007/698_2011_125]
  4. Fu J, Lee WN, Coleman C, Meyer M, Carter J, Nowack K, et al. Pilot investigation of two-stage biofiltration for removal of natural organic matter in drinking water treatment. Chemosphere. 2017; 166:311-22. [DOI:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.09.101][PMID]
  5. Naghizadeh A, Nasseri S, Rashidi AM, Rezaei Kalantary R, Nabizadeh R, Mahvi AH. Adsorption kinetics and thermodynamics of hydrophobic Natural Organic Matter (NOM) removal from aqueous solution by multi-wall carbon nanotubes. Water Supply. 2013; 13(2):273-85. [DOI:10.2166/ws.2013.018]
  6. Matilainen A, Vepsäläinen M, Sillanpää M. Natural organic matter removal by coagulation during drinking water treatment: A review. Adv Colloid Interface Sci. 2010; 159(2):189-97. [DOI:10.1016/j.cis.2010.06.007][PMID]
  7. Lin WS, Lee M, Huang YC, Den W. Identifying water recycling strategy using multivariate statistical analysis for high-tech industries in Taiwan. Resour Conserv Recycl. 2015; 94:35-42. [DOI:10.1016/j.resconrec.2014.11.007]
  8. Qasim SR, Motley EM, Zhu G. Water works engineering: Planning, design, and operation. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall; 2000. https://books.google.com/books?id=cAlSAAAAMAAJ&dq
  9. Kazemi Noredinvand B, Takdastan A, Jalilzadeh Yengejeh R. Removal of organic matter from drinking water by single and dual media filtration: A comparative pilot study. Desalination Water Treat. 2016; 57(44):20792-9. [DOI:10.1080/19443994.2015.1110718]
  10. Al-Ghouti MA, Al-Kaabi MA, Ashfaq MY, Da’na DA. Produced water characteristics, treatment and reuse: A review. J Water Process Eng. 2019; 28:222-39. [DOI:10.1016/j.jwpe.2019.02.001]
  11. Badalians Gholikandi G, Noorisepehr M, Dehghanifard E, Koolivand A, Dehnavi A, Moalej S. Application of modified qualitative index for surveillance of water-filtration process in turbidity removal by different media. Int J Environ Sci Technol. 2012; 9(4):691-700. [DOI:10.1007/s13762-012-0026-x]
  12. Yang L, She Q, Wan MP, Wang R, Chang VWC, Tang CY. Removal of haloacetic acids from swimming pool water by reverse osmosis and nanofiltration. Water Res. 2017; 116:116-25. [DOI:10.1016/j.watres.2017.03.025][PMID]
  13. Sillanpää M, Ncibi MC, Matilainen A, Vepsäläinen M. Removal of natural organic matter in drinking water treatment by coagulation: A comprehensive review. Chemosphere. 2018; 190:54-71. [DOI:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.09.113][PMID]
  14. de Vera GA, Lauderdale Ch, Alito CL, Hooper J, Wert EC. Using upstream oxidants to minimize surface biofouling and improve hydraulic performance in GAC biofilters. Water Res. 2019; 148:526-34. [DOI:10.1016/j.watres.2018.10.085][PMID]
  15. Shanmuganathan S, Loganathan P, Kazner Ch, Johir MAH, Vigneswaran S. Submerged membrane filtration adsorption hybrid system for the removal of organic micropollutants from a water reclamation plant reverse osmosis concentrate. Desalination. 2017; 401:134-41. [DOI:10.1016/j.desal.2016.07.048]
  16. Fu J, Lee WN, Coleman C, Nowack K, Carter J, Huang CH. Removal of disinfection byproduct (DBP) precursors in water by two-stage biofiltration treatment. Water Res. 2017; 123:224-35. [DOI:10.1016/j.watres.2017.06.073][PMID]
  17. Furhacker M, Measho Haile T, Monai B, Mentler A. Performance of a filtration system equipped with filter media for parking lot runoff treatment. Desalination. 2011; 275(1-3):118-25. [DOI:10.1016/j.desal.2011.02.041]
  18. Ho L, Grasset Ch, Hoefel D, Dixon MB, Leusch FDL, Newcombe G, et al. Assessing granular media filtration for the removal of chemical contaminants from wastewater. Water Res. 2011; 45(11):3461-72. [DOI:10.1016/j.watres.2011.04.005][PMID]
  19. Baraee I, Borghei SM, Takdastan A, Hasani AH, Javid AH. Performance of biofilters in GAC-sand and anthracite-sand dual-media filters in a water treatment plant in Abadan, Iran. Desalination Water Treat. 2016; 57(42):19655-64. [DOI:10.1080/19443994.2015.1101715]
  20. Baird R, Rice EW, Eaton AD, Bridgewater L, Water Environment Federation, editors. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. 23rd Washington, D.C.: American Public Health Association; 2017. https://books.google.com/books?id=V2LhtAEACAAJ&dq
  21. Sabiri NE, Monnier E, Raimbault V, Massé A, Séchet V, Jaouen P. Effect of filtration rate on coal-sand dual-media filter performances for microalgae removal. Environ Technol. 2017; 38(3):345-52. [DOI:10.1080/09593330.2016.1193224][PMID]
  22. Chavan P, Soltis M, Warren J, Heavener M. Two-step removal of DBP precursors from challenging saxman (AK) surface water using MIEX pretreatment followed by filtration. In: Zufelt JE, editor. ISCORD 2013: Planning for Sustainable Cold Regions. Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers; 2013. pp. 811-820.[DOI:10.1061/9780784412978.077]
  23. Mishra Sh, Tembhurkar AR. Application of foam and sand as dual media filter for rooftop rainwater harvesting system. In: Rathinasamy M, Chandramouli S, Phanindra K, Mahesh U, editors. Water Resources and Environmental Engineering I. Singapore: Springer; 2019. pp. 89-97. [DOI:10.1007/978-981-13-2044-6_9]
  24. Borrull J, Colom A, Fabregas J, Borrull F, Pocurull E. Presence, behaviour and removal of selected organic micropollutants through drinking water treatment. Chemosphere. 2021; 276:130023. [DOI:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.130023][PMID]
  25. Kaarela O, Koppanen M, Kesti T, Kettunen R, Palmroth M, Rintala J. Natural organic matter removal in a full-scale drinking water treatment plant using ClO2 oxidation: Performance of two virgin granular activated carbons. J Water Process Eng. 2021; 41:102001. [DOI:10.1016/j.jwpe.2021.102001]
  26. Wang H, Ji G, Bai X. Quantifying nitrogen transformation process rates using nitrogen functional genesin a multimedia biofilter under hydraulic loading rate Ecol Eng. 2015; 82:323-9. [DOI:10.1016/j.ecoleng.2015.05.023]
  27. de Vera GA, Gerrity D, Stoker M, Frehner W, Wert EC. Impact of upstream chlorination on filter performance and microbial community structure of GAC and anthracite biofilters. Environ Sci Water Res Technol. 2018; 4(8):1133-44. [DOI:10.1039/C8EW00115D]
  28. Feng S, Chen C, Wang QF, Zhang XJ, Yang ZY, Xie SG. Characterization of microbial communities in a granular activated carbon-sand dual media filter for drinking water treatment. Int J Environ Sci Technol. 2013; 10(5):917-22. [DOI:10.1007/s13762-013-0188-1]
  29. Edzwald JK, Tobiason JE. Enhanced coagulation: US requirements and a broader view. Water Sci Technol. 1999; 40(9):63-70. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0273122399006411
  30. Marais SS, Ncube EJ, Msagati TAM, Mamba BB, Nkambule TTI. Assessment of trihalomethane (THM) precursors using specific ultraviolet absorbance (SUVA) and molecular size distribution (MSD). J Water Process Eng. 2019; 27:143-51. [DOI:10.1016/j.jwpe.2018.11.019]
  31. Piche A, Campbell A, Douglas I, Basu OD. Analyzing the performance of biological versus conventional drinking water filtration under warm and cold water conditions: A pilot scale study. Chemosphere. 2019; 234:52-61. [DOI:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.05.180][PMID]
  32. Xu D, Bai L, Tang X, Niu D, Luo X, Zhu X, et al. A comparison study of sand filtration and ultrafiltration in drinking water treatment: Removal of organic foulants and disinfection by-product formation. Sci Total Environ. 2019; 691:322-31. [DOI:10.1016/j.2019.07.071][PMID]
  33. Abdelrady A, Sharma S, Sefelnasr A, Abogbal A, Kennedy M. Investigating the impact of temperature and organic matter on the removal of selected organic micropollutants during bank filtration: A batch study. J Environ Chem Eng. 2019; 7(1):102904. [DOI:10.1016/j.jece.2019.102904]
Journal of Advances in Environmental Health Research
Volume 9, Issue 2
Spring 2021
Pages 117-128