Municipal solid waste characterization, quantification, and management: A case study in Shadegan International Wetland region, Iran

Document Type: Original Article

Authors

1 Department of Environmental Health, School of Health, Environmental Technology Research Center, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical sciences, Ahvaz, Iran

2 Department of Environmental Health, School of Health, Air Pollution and Respiratory Diseases Research Center, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical sciences, Ahvaz, Iran

3 Department of Environmental Health Engineering, School of Health, Student Research Office, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

4 Department of Environmental Health Engineering, Behbahan Faculty of Medical Sciences, Behbahan, Iran

5 Department of Environmental Health Engineering, School of Health, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

10.22102/jaehr.2019.158736.1115

Abstract

Thepresent study aimed to investigate the description and determination of municipal waste management in seven cities located in Shadegan wetland region, Iran. Some parameters were evaluated, including the waste generation rate, weight density rate, moisture content, pH, and carbon-to-nitrogen (C/N) ratio. In addition, the current status of waste management in the region was assessed using a simple questionnaire and via interviews with households and field surveys. According to the findings, the generation rate of solid wastes was 0.55-0.8 kg/capita/day. The wastes contained approximately 70% of corruptible materials, more than 12% of plastic, and approximately 9% of paper and paperboard. The density, moisture content, pH, and C/N were estimated at 3,242 kg/m, 72.7%, 5.6, and 23.4, respectively. In Shadegan wetland region, recycling was active through the informal sectors, while there was no definite program for source reduction and recycling. Daily collection operations were carried out with no specific programs and prioritization in determining the route of the vehicle and performed manually in optimal conditions. Moreover, the final disposal was observed to be poor and in the dumping form. The obtained results indicated that the wastes in the region had considerable potential for recycling and composting. Therefore, it is recommended that integrated waste management be applied through the improvement of the regulations, environmental education, development of source reduction programs, organized recycling, mechanization of waste collection, establishment of central composting plants, and selection and design of safe landfills in order to achieve optimal outcomes.
 

Keywords


1. Abu Qdais HA, Hamoda M, Newham J. Analysis of residential solid waste at generation sites. Waste Manag  Res 1997; 15(4): 395-405.

2. Hashemi M, Pourzamani HR, Chavoshani A, Mengelizadeh N, Parseh I, Heidari Farsani M, et al. Industrial landfill site selection using Analytical Hierarchy Process (Case study: Razi industrial town of Isfahan-Iran). J Adv Environ Health Res 2017; 5(1): 51-58.

3. Kumar KN, Goel S. Characterization of municipal solid waste (MSW) and a proposed management plan for Kharagpur, West Bengal, India. Resourc Conserv Recycl 2009; 53(3): 166-174.

4. Thitame SN, Pondhe G, Meshram D. Characterisation and composition of municipal solid waste (MSW) generated in Sangamner City, District Ahmednagar, Maharashtra, India. Environ Monit Assess 2010; 170(1-4): 1-5.

5. Chattopadhyay S, Dutta A, Ray S. Municipal solid waste management in Kolkata, India–A review. Waste Manag 2009; 29(4): 1449-1458.

6. Sharholy M, Ahmad K, Mahmood G, Trivedi R. Municipal solid waste management in Indian cities–A review. WasteManag 2008; 28(2): 459-467.

7. Aziz SQ, Aziz HA, Bashir MJ, Yusoff MS. Appraisal of domestic solid waste generation, components, and the feasibility of recycling in Erbil, Iraq. Waste Manag Res 2011; 29(8): 880-887.

8. Chang N-B, Davila E. Minimax regret optimization analysis for a regional solid waste management system. Waste Manag 2007; 27(6): 820-832.

9. Geng Y, Zhu Q, Haight M. Planning for integrated solid waste management at the industrial Park level: A case of Tianjin, China. Waste Manag 2007; 27(1): 141-150.

10. Mirzaei N, Nori J, Mahvi AH, Yunesian M, Malaki A. Assessment of environmental impacts produced by compost plant in Sanandaj. Sci J Kurdistan Univ Med Sci 2010; 14(4): 79-88.

11. Tapouk F, Sohrabi Y, Karami M, Ahmadi A, Ahmadi S, Ahmadpour M, et al. Assessment of waste management system in hospitals affiliated with Urmia University of medical science in 2013. Int J Pharm Technol 2016; 8(3): 18664-18675.

12. Zamani Badi H, Mirzaei N, Mohammedan H, Akbari H, Ahmadpour M, Adabi S, et al. Evaluation of the knowledge and attitudes of personnel and students in paper recycling in Kashan University of Medical Sciences. Int J Pharm Technol 2016; 8(3): 18915-18924.

13. Vidanaarachchi CK, Yuen ST, Pilapitiya S. Municipal solid waste management in the Southern Province of Sri Lanka: Problems, issues and challenges. Waste Manag 2006; 26(8): 920-930.

14. Metin E, Eröztürk A, Neyim C. Solid waste management practices and review of recovery and recycling operations in Turkey. Waste Manag 2003; 23(5): 425-432.

15. Hui P, Chaintreau A, Scott J, Gass R, Crowcroft J, Diot C. editors, Pocket switched networks and human mobility in conference environments. Proceedings of the 2005 ACM SIGCOMM workshop on Delay-tolerant networking; 2005: ACM.

16. Magrinho A, Didelet F, Semiao V. Municipal solid waste disposal in Portugal. Waste Manag 2006; 26(12): 1477-1489.

17. Gidarakos E, Havas G, Ntzamilis P. Municipal solid waste composition determination supporting the integrated solid waste management system in the island of Crete. Waste Manag 2006; 26(6): 668-679.

18. Jafari A, Godini H, Mirhousaini S. Municipal solid waste management in KhoramAbad city and experiences. Int J Environ Ecol Eng 2010; 4: 163-168.

19. Hassanvand M, Nabizadeh R, Heidari M. Municipal solid waste analysis in Iran. Iran J Health Environ 2008; 1(1): 9-18.

20. Aguilar-Virgen Q, Armijo-De Vega C, Taboada-González P, Ojeda-Benítez S. Municipal solid waste generation and characterization in Ensenada, México.Open Waste Manag J 2010; 3: 140-145.

21. Miezah K, Obiri-Danso K, Kádár Z, Fei-Baffoe B, Mensah MY. Municipal solid waste characterization and quantification as a measure towards effective waste management in Ghana. Waste Manag 2015; 46: 15-27.

22. Ozcan HK, Guvenc SY, Guvenc L, Demir G. Municipal solid waste characterization according to different income levels: A case study. Sustain 2016; 8(10): 1044.

23. Al-Khatib IA, Monou M, Zahra ASFA, Shaheen HQ, Kassinos D. Solid waste characterization, quantification and management practices in developing countries. A case study: Nablus district–Palestine. J Environ Manag 2010; 91(5): 1131-1138.

24. Manaf LA, Samah MaA, Zukki NIM. Municipal solid waste management in Malaysia: Practices and challenges. Waste Manag 2009; 29(11): 2902-2906.

25. Zhang DQ, Tan SK, Gersberg RM. Municipal solid waste management in China: status, problems and challenges. J Environ Manag 2010; 91(8): 1623-1633.

26. Ogwueleka TC. Municipal solid waste characteristics and management in Nigeria. Iran J Environ Health Sci  Eng 2009; 6(3):173-180.

27. Kaffashi S, Shamsudin MN, Radam A, Yacob MR, Rahim KA, Yazid M. Economic valuation and conservation: Do people vote for better preservation of Shadegan International Wetland? Biol Conserv 2012; 150(1): 150-158.

28. Seto KC, Fragkias M. Mangrove conversion and aquaculture development in Vietnam: A remote sensing-based approach for evaluating the Ramsar Convention on Wetlands. Glob Environ Change 2007; 17(3-4): 486-500.