Improvement of petroleum hydrocarbon remediation using the oat plant in the soil treated by poultry manure

Document Type: Original Article

Authors

1 Department of Chemical Engineering, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Kerman, Iran

2 Department of Soil Science, College of Agriculture, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran

3 Chemical and Petroleum Engineering Department, School of Engineering, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran

Abstract

This greenhouse experiment aimed to investigate the effects of poultry manure (PM) on the growth of oat plant (Avena sativa) and removal of total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPHs) from soil. The treatments consisted of three TPH levels (4%, 6%, and 8% w/w) and two PM levels (zero and 1%) at three replications. According to the findings, shoot height, number of leaves, and the fresh and dry weight of the shoots and roots of oat decreased significantly with 6% and 8% TPHs compared to 4% contamination level. On the other hand, the removal of TPHs and microbial respiration rate significantly increased by 16.8% and 78.18%, respectively in the PM treatment compared to the non-PM treatment. The rate was estimated at 28.85% and 27.03% in the soil cultivated by oat compared to the unplanted soil, respectively. The highest and lowest removal rate of TPHs was observed in the soil cultivated with oats in the PM treatments containing 4% of the TPHs (45.25%) and unplanted treatments without manure containing 8% of TPHs (11.38%). Therefore, it could be concluded that the addition of PM to the soil cultivated with oat in the soils with TPH contamination could increase the microbial respiration rate of the soil, as well as the removal of TPHs.

Keywords


  1. Huang XD, El-Alawi Y, Gurska J, Glick BR, Greenberg BM. A multi-process phytoremediation system for decontamination of persistent total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPHs) from soils. Microchem J 2005; 81(1):139-147.
  2. Hentati O, Lachhab R, Ayadi M, Ksibi M. Toxicity assessment for petroleum-contaminated soil using terrestrial invertebrates and plant bioassays. Environ Monit Assess 2013; 185(4):2989-2998.
  3. Kaimi E, Mukaidani T, Tamaki M. Screening of twelve plant species for phytoremediation of petroleum hydrocarbon-contaminated soil. Plant Product Sci 2007; 10(2): 211-218.
  4. Kabra AN, Khandare RV, Waghmode TR, Govindwar SP. Phytoremediation of textile effluent and mixture of structurally different dyes by Glandularia pulchella (Sweet) Tronc. Chemosphere 2012; 87(3): 265-272.
  5. Robinson SL, Novak JT, Widdowson MA, Crosswell SB, Fetterolf GJ. Field and laboratory evaluation of the impact of tall fescue on polyaromatic hydrocarbon degradation in an aged creosote-contaminated surface soil. J Environ Eng 2003; 129(3):232-240.
  6. Escalante-Espinosa E, Gallegos-Martínez M E, Favela-Torres E, Gutiérrez-Rojas M. Improvement of the hydrocarbon phytoremediation rate by Cyperus laxus Lam. inoculated with a microbial consortium in a model system. Chemosphere 2005; 59(3): 405-413.
  7. Khan S, Afzal M, Iqbal S, Khan QM. Plant-bacteria partnerships for the remediation of hydrocarbon contaminated soils. Chemosphere 2013; 90(4):1317-1332.
  8. Aprill W, Sims RC. Evaluation of the use of prairie grasses for stimulating polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon treatment in soil. Chemosphere 1990; 20(1-2): 253-265.
  9. Siddiqui S, Adams WA, Schollion J. The phytotoxicity and degradation of diesel hydrocarbons in soil. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 2001; 164(6):631-635.
  10. Pilon-Smits E. Phytoremediation. Annu Rev Plant Biol 2005; 56:15-39.
  11. Palmroth MR, Pichtel J, Puhakka JA. Phytoremediation of subarctic soil contaminated with diesel fuel. Bioresour Technol 2002; 84(3):221-228.
  12. Shirdam R, Zand A, Bidhendi G, Mehrdadi N. Phytoremediation of hydrocarbon-contaminated soils with emphasis on the effect of petroleum hydrocarbons on the growth of plant species. Phytoprotection 2008; 89(1):21-29.
  13. Cheema SA, Khan MI, Tang X, Zhang C, Shen C, Malik Z, et al.  Enhancement of phenanthrene and pyrene degradation in rhizosphere of tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea). J Hazard Mater 2009; 166(2-3):1226-1231.
  14. Phillips LA, Greer CW, Germida JJ. Culture-based and culture-independent assessment of the impact of mixed and single plant treatments on rhizosphere microbial communities in hydrocarbon contaminated flare-pit soil. Soil Biol Biochem 2006; 38(9):2823-2833.
  15. Wang J, Zhang Z, Su Y, He W, He F, Song H. Phytoremediation of petroleum polluted soil. Pet Sci 2008; 5:167-71.
  16. Miya RK, Firestone MK. Enhanced phenanthrene biodegradation in soil by slender oat root exudates and root debris. J Environ Qual 2001; 30(6):1911-1918.
  17. Hutchinson SL, Schwab AP, Banks MK. Phytoremediation of aged petroleum sludge: effect of irrigation techniques and scheduling. J Environ Qual 2001; 30(5): 1516-1523.
  18. Gee GW, Bauder JW. Particle size analysis - hydrometer method. In: Methods of soil analysis. Part III, 3rd edn. ASA and SSSA, Madison, 1986; pp 383-411.
  19. Nelson DW, Sommers LE. Total carbon, organic carbon and organic matter. In: Method of soil analysis, Part III, 3rd edn. ASA and SSSA, Madison, 1996; pp 961-1010.
  20. Thomas GW. Soil pH and soil acidity. In: Method of soil analysis, Part III, 3rd edn. ASA and SSSA, Madison, 1996. pp 475-490. 
  21. Rhoades JD. Salinity: electrical conductivity and total dissolved solids. In: Method of soil analysis, Part III, 3rd edn. ASA and SSSA, Madison, 1996; pp 417-436
  22. Watanabe, F.S. and Olsen, S.R. Test of an ascorbic acid method for determining phosphorus in water and NaHCO3 extracts from soil 1. Soil Science Society of America Journal 1965; 29(6):677-678.
  23. Bremner JM. Nitrogen total. In: Methods of soil analysis. Part III. 3rd ed. Madison (WI): ASA and SSSA.1996; p.1085-1122.
  24. Lindsay WL, Norvell WA. Development of a DTPA soil test for zinc, iron, manganese, and copper. Soil Sci Soc Am J 1978; 42(3):421-428.
  25. Minai-Tehrani D, Herfatmanesh A. Biodegradation of aliphatic and aromatic fractions of heavy crude oil-contaminated soil: a pilot study. Bioremediat J 2007;11:71-76
  26. Isermeyer, H. Estimation of soil respiration in closed jars. Method in applied soil microbiology and biochemistry. Academy, London 1952; 214-216.
  27. Anderson JP. Soil respiration. In: Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 2. Chemical and microbiological properties; 1982. P. 831-871.
  28. Shanker  AK, Cervantes C, Loza-Tavera H, Avudainayagam S. Chromium toxicity in plants. Environ Int 2005; 31(5):739-53.
  29. Chupakhina GN, Maslennikov PV. Plant adaptation to oil stress. Russ J Ecol 2004; 35(5):290-295.
  30. Merkl N, Schultze-Kraft R, Infante C. Phytoremediation in the tropics-the effect of crude oil on the growth of tropical plants. Bioremediat J 2004; 8(3-4):177-184.
  31. Merkl N, Schultze-Kraft R, Infante C. Phytoremediation in the tropics-influence of heavy crude oil on root morphological characteristics of graminoids. Environ Pollut 2005; 138:86-91
  32. Nwadinigwe AO, Onwumere OH. Effects of petroleum spills on the germination and growth of soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.). Nig J Botany 2003; 16:76-90.
  33. Ogboghodo IA, Iruaga EK, Osemwota IO, Chokor JU. An assessment of the effects of crude oil pollution on soil properties, germination and growth of maize (Zea mays) using two crude types–Forcados light and Escravos light. Environ Monit Assess 2004; 96(1-3):143-152.
  34. Chirakkara RA, Reddy KR. Biomass and chemical amendments for enhanced phytoremediation of mixed contaminated soils. Ecol Engin 2015; 85:265-274.
  35. Liste HH, Felgentreu D. Crop growth, culturable bacteria, and degradation of petrol hydrocarbons (PHCs) in a long-term contaminated field soil. Appl Soil Ecol 2006; 31(1-2):43-52.
  36. Amadi A, Dickson AA, Maate GO. Remediation of oil polluted soils: 1. Effect of organic and inorganic nutrient supplements on the performance of maize (Zea may L). Water Air Soil Pollut 1993; 66(1-2): 59-76.
  37. Bulu YI, Adewole MB. Organic fertilizer applications influence on the shoot and root biomass production and plant nutrient of Calopogonium mucunoides from crude oil-contaminated soils. Chem Spec Bioavailab 2015; 27(1): 2-7.
  38. Besalatpour AA, Hajabbasi MA, Khoshgoftarmanesh AH. Reclamation of a petroleum-contaminated calcareous soil using phytostimulation. Soil Sediment Contam 2010; 19(5):547-559.
  39. Vouillamoz J, Milke MW. Effect of compost in phytoremediation of diesel-contaminated soils. Water Sci Technol 2001; 43(2):291-295.
  40. Escalante-Espinos  E, Gallegos-Martínez ME, Favela-Torres E, Gutiérrez-Rojas M. Improvement of the hydrocarbon phytoremediation rate by Cyperus laxus Lam. inoculated with a microbial consortium in a model system. Chemosphere 2005; 59(3): 405-413.
  41. Peng S, Zhou Q, Cai Z, Zhang Z. Phytoremediation of petroleum contaminated soils by Mirabilis Jalapa L. in a greenhouse plot experiment. J Hazard Mater 2009; 168(2-3):1490-1496.