Assessment of ultrasound irradiation on inactivation of gram negative and positive bacteria isolated from hospital in aqueous solution

Document Type: Original Article

Authors

1 Kurdistan Environmental Health Research Center, Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, Sanandaj, Iran

2 Department of Microbiology, School of Medicine, Alborz University of Medical Sciences, Karaj, Iran

Abstract

Microbial contamination of water poses a major threat to public health. With the emergence of microorganisms resistant to multiple antimicrobial agents, there is increased request for promotion of disinfection methods. Since ultrasound wave (US) exhibits antibacterial activities on bacteria, the aim of this study was to evaluate the antimicrobial effect of low frequency (37 kHz) ultrasound on Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus as a model for gram-negative and gram-positive bacteria, respectively. Sonolysis experiment was carried out in a laboratory-scale batch sonoreactor equipped with plate type transducer at 400 W of acoustic power in the presence and absence of ampicillin as an antibiotic on the both Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus. All of the bacteria were affected by the ultrasound and an increase in percent kill for both bacteria occurred with increasing duration of exposure and intensity of ultrasound. It was found that gram-negative bacteria were more susceptible to the ultrasonic treatment rather than gram-positive bacteria. In addition, the combination of US with an antibiotic (ampicillin) enhanced killing of both bacteria over the use of US alone. The rate of bactericide effect of US wave was increased in samples containing ampicillin. This process was influenced by the chemical and microbiological characteristics of aqueous media. Therefore, with further research about its practicality for treatment of wastewater, it may become a possible substitute process for wastewater disinfection.

Keywords


1. Kasper DL. Harrison's principles of internal medicine. Vol 1. 16th ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, Medical Publishing Division; 2005.

2. Eriksen HM, Iversen BG, Aavitsland P. Prevalence of nosocomial infections in hospitals in Norway, 2002 and 2003. J Hosp Infect 2005; 60(1): 40-5.

3. Mason TJ, Joyce E, Phull SS, Lorimer JP. Potential uses of ultrasound in the biological decontamination of water. Ultrason Sonochem 2003; 10(6): 319-23.

4. Phull SS, Newman AP, Lorimer JP, Pollet B, Mason TJ. The development and evaluation of ultrasound in the biocidal treatment of water. Ultrason Sonochem 1997; 4(2): 157-64.

5. Delissalde F, Amabile-Cuevas CF. Comparison of antibiotic susceptibility and plasmid content, between biofilm producing and non-producing clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2004; 24(4): 405-8.

6. Kluytmans J, van Belkum A, Verbrugh H. Nasal carriage of Staphylococcus aureus: epidemiology, underlying mechanisms, and associated risks. Clin Microbiol Rev 1997; 10(3): 505-20.

7. Baron J, Finglod S. Methods for identification of ethiologic agents of infections diseases. In: Forbes BA, Sahm DF, Weissfeld AS, Bailey WR, editors. Baliy and Scottos diagnostic microbiology. 12th ed. New York, NY: Elsevier Mosby; 2007.

8. Eaton AD, Franson MAH, American Public Health Association. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. 21th ed. Washington, DC: American Public Health Association; 2005.

9. Villamiel M, De Jong P. Inactivation of Pseudomonas fluorescens and Streptococcus thermophilus in Trypticase® Soy Broth and total bacteria in milk by continuous-flow ultrasonic treatment and conventional heating. Journal of Food Engineering 2000; 45(3): 171-9.

10. Alliger H. Ultrasonic disruption. American Laboratory 1975; 10: 75-85.

11. Piyasena P, Mohareb E, McKellar RC. Inactivation of microbes using ultrasound: a review. Int J Food Microbiol 2003; 87(3): 207-16.

12. Scherba G, Weigel RM, O'Brien WDJr. Quantitative assessment of the germicidal efficacy of ultrasonic energy. Appl Environ Microbiol 1991; 57(7): 2079-84.

13. Todar K. Bacterial resistance to antibiotics [Online].[cited 2008]; Available from: URL: http://textbookofbacteriology.net/resantimicrobial.html

14. Johnson LL, Peterson RV, Pitt WG. Treatment of bacterial biofilms on polymeric biomaterials using antibiotics and ultrasound. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 1998; 9(11): 1177-85.

15. Rediske AM, Rapoport N, Pitt WG. Reducing bacterial resistance to antibiotics with ultrasound. Lett Appl Microbiol 1999; 28(1): 81-4.

16. Mason TJ. Developments in ultrasound--non-medical. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 2007; 93(1-3): 166-75.