Home Articles List Article Information
Journal of Advances in Environmental Health Research
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 6 (2018)
Volume Volume 5 (2017)
Volume Volume 4 (2016)
Volume Volume 3 (2015)
Volume Volume 2 (2014)
Volume Volume 1 (2013)
Eskandari, H., Alizadeh-Amraie, A. (2016). Ability of some crops for phytoremediation of nickel and zinc heavy metals from contaminated soils. Journal of Advances in Environmental Health Research, 4(4), 234-239. doi: 10.22102/jaehr.2016.45965
Hamdollah Eskandari; Ashraf Alizadeh-Amraie. "Ability of some crops for phytoremediation of nickel and zinc heavy metals from contaminated soils". Journal of Advances in Environmental Health Research, 4, 4, 2016, 234-239. doi: 10.22102/jaehr.2016.45965
Eskandari, H., Alizadeh-Amraie, A. (2016). 'Ability of some crops for phytoremediation of nickel and zinc heavy metals from contaminated soils', Journal of Advances in Environmental Health Research, 4(4), pp. 234-239. doi: 10.22102/jaehr.2016.45965
Eskandari, H., Alizadeh-Amraie, A. Ability of some crops for phytoremediation of nickel and zinc heavy metals from contaminated soils. Journal of Advances in Environmental Health Research, 2016; 4(4): 234-239. doi: 10.22102/jaehr.2016.45965

Ability of some crops for phytoremediation of nickel and zinc heavy metals from contaminated soils

Article 8, Volume 4, Issue 4, Autumn 2016, Page 234-239  XML PDF (4.75 MB)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.22102/jaehr.2016.45965
Authors
Hamdollah Eskandari email ; Ashraf Alizadeh-Amraie
Department of Agriculture, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran
Abstract
The present study was aimed at comparing the ability of three crop plants for phytoremediation of zinc (Zn) and nickel (Zn) from soils. A factorial (3×2×3) experiment based on RCBD was used to compare the treatments, and was repeated three times. The first factor was crop type (wheat, clover and rapeseed), the second factor was heavy metal types (zinc (Zn) and nickel (Ni)) and the third factor was heavy metal concentration in soil (0.0, 50 and 100 mg.kg-1). With regard to plant type and heavy metal, the highest uptake was recorded in wheat for nickel (Ni) uptake. The lowest uptake of heavy metal was seen in clover crop and nickel (Ni) heavy metal. The highest Ni uptake was observed in wheat at the concentration of 100mg.kg-1. Nickel (Ni) was more absorbed in its higher concentration where the uptake of nickel (Ni) at the concentration of 100.0mg.kg-1 was 182% more than 50.0 mg.kg-1. Generally, the results of this experiment showed that it is possible to use phytoremediation as a suitable means for eliminating the excess concentration of zinc (Zn) and nickel (Ni). In this case, wheat was the superior crop and its mechanisms for removal of heavy metal require further investigation.
Keywords
bioaccumulation; heavy metal pollution; toxic effect
References
  1.  Hassan Z, Aarts MGM. Opportunities and feasibilities for biotechnological improvement of Zn, Cd or Ni tolerance and accumulation in plants. Environ Exp Bot 2011; 72(1): 53-63.
  2. Naderi MR, Danesh-Shahraki AR, Naderi R. A review on polluted soils by heavy metals. Human Environ 2013; 23: 35-49. [In Persian].
  3. Eskandari H. The text book of physiology of abiotic stress on crop plant. Arna publication; 2015; 270-275. 
  4. Amouie AI, Mahvi AH, Nadafi K. Effect of chemical materials on cupper and cadmium uptake by plants in North Iran. J Mazandaran Univ Med Sci. 2012;22(86): 116-124. [In Persian].
  5. Davari M, Homaie M. A new yield multiplicative model for simultaneous phytoextraction of Ni and Cd from contaminated soils. J Water Soil 2012; 25(6): 1332-1343.
  6. Salimi M, Amin MM, Ebrahimi A, Ghazifard A, Najafi P, Amini H, et al. Influence of salinity on phytoremediation of cadmium on contaminated soils. J Health Res 2012; 7(6): 1130-1137. [In ersian].
  7. Giordani C, Cecchi S, Zanchi C. Phytoremediation of soil polluted by nickel using agricultural crops. Environ manage 2005; 36(5): 675-681.
  8. Barakat MA. New trends in removing heavy metals from industries wastewater. Arab J Chem 2011; 4(4): 361-377.
  9. Fu F, Wang Q. Removal of heavy metal ions from wastewaters: A review. J Environ Manage 2011; 92: 407-418.
  10. Liphadzi MS, Kirkham MB. Availability and plant uptake of heavy metals in EDTA-assisted phytoremediation of soil and composted bio solids. S Afr J Bot 2006; 72(3): 391-397.
  11. Akbarpour F, Sadri F, Golalizadeh D. Phytoremediation of heavy metal (Lead, Zinc and Cadmium) from polluted soils by Arasbaran protected areas native plants. J Water Soil Conserv 2013; 1(4): 53-67. [In Persian].
  12. Parnian A, Choram M, Jafarzadeh N, Dinarvand, M. Phytoremediation of nickel from hydroponic environment using Ceratophyllum demersum. Greenhouse Sci Technol 2012; 6: 75-84. [In Persian].
  13. Cunningham SD, Ow DW. Promises and prospects of phytoremediation. Plant Physiol 1996; 110: 715-719.
  14. Vinita H. Phytoremediation of toxic metals from soil and waste water. J Environ Biol 2007; 28(2): 367-376.
  15. Memon AR, Aktoprakligil, Ozdemir A, Vertli A. Heavy metal accumulation and detoxification mechanisms in plants. Turkish Journal of Botany 2000; 25(3): 111-121.
  16. Panwar B S, Ahmed KS, Mittal SB. Phytoremediation of nickel-contaminated soils by Brassica species. Environ Dev Sustain 2002; 4(1): 1-6.
  17. Adiloglu S, Saglam T, Adiloglu A, Sume, A. Phytoremediation of nickel (Ni) fromagricultural soils using canola. Desalin Water Treat 2016; 57(6): 2383-388.
  18. Dmuchowski W, Gozdowsk Phytoremediation of zinc contaminated soils using silver bir i D, Bragoszewska P, Baczewska AH, Suwara I. ch. Ecol Eng 2012; 71: 32-35.
  19. Neisi A, Vosoughi M, Mohammadi MJ, Mohammadi B, Naeimabadi A. Phytoremediation of byHelianthus plant. J Medic Sci 2015; 2(2): 55-66. [In Persian].
  20. Khellaf N, Zerdaoui M. Phytoaccumulation of zinc by the aquatic plant Lemna gibba L. Bio Resource Technol 2009; 100(23): 6137-6140.
  21. Zhao L, Lombi E, Breedon T, MC SP. Zinc hyper accumulation and cellular distribution in Arabidopsis halleri. Plant Cell Environ 2012; 23(5): 507–514.
Statistics
Article View: 4,112
PDF Download: 1,926