Feasibility study of coagulation system to greywater treatment and economical comparison with electrocoagulation in mining areas

Document Type: Original Article

Author

Department of Mining Engineering, Higher education complex of Zarand, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Kerman, Iran

Abstract

Coagulants exert a significant influence on removing turbidity, TSS and COD. This study has examined the effects of poly-aluminium chloride (PAC), aluminium sulphate (alum) and ferric chloride on removal of turbidity, TSS, COD from greywater in residential complexes of miners working in decorative stone mines. Also, a comparison was undertaken with the electrocoagulation system to find out whether it was economical. Samples were collected over three days from the outlet pipes of greywater in the downstream of a village. The samples were sent to the laboratory to measure their organic materials. However, the Jar test was implemented by using all three coagulants, at concentrations of 100 to 1200 ppm. The results illustrate that the highest percentage of turbidity, COD and TSS removal were 98.24%, 94% and 77.25% respectively, which are related to PAC coagulant. The lowest cost to remove the organic materials in the coagulation method was harvested US $ 0.09/m3 for alum and howbeit. The cost for electrocoagulation method yielded US $ 0.05/m3 water.

Keywords


  1. Katukiza AY, Ronteltap M, Niwagaba CB, Kansiime F, Lens PNL. Greywater characterisation and pollutant loads in an urban slum. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology 2015;12: 423–436.
  2. Eriksson E. Potential and problems related to reuse of water in households. Ph.D. Thesis.Environment and Resources DTU, Technical University of Denmark, ISBN, 2002; 87:89220-692.
  3. Ottoson J, Stenstrom TA. Faecal contamination of greywater and associated microbialrisks. Water Research 2003; 37:645–655.
  4. Liu X, Chen Q, Zhu L. Improving biodegradation potential of domestic wastewater by manipulating the size distribution of organic matter. Journal of Environmental Sciences 2016; 47: 174-182.
  5. Mourad KA, Berndtsson JC, Berndtsson R. Potential fresh water saving using greywater in toilet flushing in Syria. Journal of Environmental Management 2011; 92: 2447-2453.
  6. Revitt DM, Eriksson E, Donner E. The implications of household greywater treatment and reuse for municipal wastewater flows and micropollutant loads. Water Research 2011; 45: 1549-1560.
  7. Petta L, Giordano A, Farina R, Baz IA. Efficient management of wastewater,ItsTreatment and Reuse in the Mediterranean Countries: the EMWATER Project. Options Mediterreneennes 2004;Series A n.65, 303–309.
  8. Petta L, Kramer A, Baz IA. The EMWater project-promoting efficient wastewater management and reuse in Mediterranean countries. Desalination 2007; 215: 56–63.
  9. Fatta-Kassinos D, Kalavrouziotis IK, Koukoulakis PH, Vasquez, MI. The risks associated with wastewater reuse and xenobiotics in the agroecological environment. Science of the Total Environment 2010; 409: 3555-3563.
  10. Qasim SR, Mottley EM, Zhu G. Water Works Engineering. Prentice-hall, Inc 2004.
  11. Tang H, Xiao F, Wang D. Speciation, stability, and coagulation mechanisms of hydroxyl aluminum clusters formed by PACl and alum: A critical review. Advances in Colloid and Interface Science 2016; 226: 78-85.
  12. Liang L, Tan J, Peng Y, Xia W, Xie G. The role of polyaluminum chloride in kaolinite aggregation in the sequent coagulation and flocculation process. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 2016; 468: 57-61.
  13. APHA, WPCF, AWWA. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. 19th ed., American Public Health Association (APHA),Washington, DC 2005.
  14. Fredler E, Alfiya Y. Physicochemicaltreatment of office and public building greywater. Water Science and Technology 2010; 62: 38-49.
  15. Wang C, Alpatova A, McPhedran KN, El-Din MG. Coagulation/ flocculation process with polyaluminum chloride for the remediation of oil sands process-affected water: Performance and mechanism study. Journal of Environmental Management 2015; 160: 254–262.
  16. Moussa D.T, El-Naas MH, Nasser M, Al-Marri MJ, A comprehensive review of electrocoagulation for water treatment: Potentials and challenges. Journal of Environmental Management 2017; 186: 24-41.
  17. Kuokkanen V, Kuokkanen T, Rämo J, Lassi U. Electrocoagulation treatment of peat bog drainage water containing humic substancesOriginal. Water Research 2015; 79:79-872001; 84: 29–41.
  18. Palahouane B, Drouiche N, Aoudj S, Bensadok K. Cost-effective electrocoagulation process for the remediation of fluoride from pretreated photovoltaic wastewater. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Chemistry 2015; 22: 127–131.
  19. Ernst M, Sperlich A, ZhengX, Gan Y, Hu J, Zhao X, Wang, J., Jekel M. An integrated wastewater treatment and reuse concept for the Olympic Park 2008. Beijing. Desalination 2006; 202: 293–301.
  20. Asano, T. Milestones in the reuse of municipal wastewater. Proceedings of water supply and sanitation for all, Berching. Germany, 2007;295-306.
  21. Maeda, M, Nakada K, Kawamoto K, Ikeda M. Area-wide use of reclaimed water in Tokyo, Japan. Water Science and Technology 1996;33: 51–57.
  22. Fangyue Li, Wichmann K, Otterpohl R. Review of the technological approaches for grey water treatment and reuses. Science of the Total Environment 2009; 407: 3439–3449.
  23. 23.Sostar-Turk S, Petrinic I, Simonic M. Laundry wastewater treatment using coagulation and membrane filtration. Resources Conservation and Recycling 2005, 44: 185–96.
  24. Qokhan EU, Solmaz SKA, Ciner F. Natural organic matter removal and enhanced coagulation as a link between coagulation and electrocoagulation. Desalination and Water Treatment 2009; 2: 203-222.
  25. Gokhan EU, Solmaz SKA, Ciner AF, Basaya, HS. Tertiary treatment of a secondary effluent by the coupling of coagulation- flocculationdisinfection for irrigation reuse. Desalination 2011; 277: 207–212.
  26. Zhao YX, Gao BY, Shon HK, Cao BC, Kim JH. Coagulation characteristics of titanium (Ti) salt coagulant compared with aluminum (Al) and iron (Fe) salts. Journal of Hazardous Materials 2010; 185: 1536-42.
  27. Antonopoulou G, Kirkou A, Stasinakis AS. Quantitive and qualitive qreywater characterization in greek households and investigation of their treatment using physicochemical metods. Science of the Total Environment 2013; 454-455, 426-432.
  28. Hendricks D. Fundamentals of water treatment unit processes: physical, chemical and biological, USA. CRC Press. IWA Publishing 2011.
  29. Davis ML. Water and wastewater engineering; design. principles and practice. USA; MC Graw-hill 2010.
  30. Esplugas S, Gimenez J, Contreras S, Pascual E, Rodriguez M. Comparison of different advanced oxidation processes for phenol degradation. Water Research 2002; 36: 1034–1042.
  31. Solmaz SKA, Ustun GE, Birgul A, Yonar T. Treatability studies with chemical precipitation and ion exchange for an organized industrial district (OID)effluent in Bursa, Turkey. Desalination 2007; 217: 301–312.
  32. Solmaz SKA, Ustun GE, Birgul A, Yonar T. Advanced oxidation of textile dyeing effluents: comparison of Fe+2/H2O2,Fe+3/H2O2, O3 and chemical coagulation processes. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin 2009, 18: 1424–1433.
  33. Demirbas E, Kobya M. Operating cost and treatment of metalworking fluid wastewater by chemical coagulation and electrocoagulation process. Process Safety and Environmental Protection 2017; 105: 79-90.
  34. Sahu O, Mazumdar B, Chaudhari PK. Treatment of wastewater by electrocoagulation: a review.  Environmental Science Pollution Research 2014; 21: 2397–2413.
  35. Dieter K. Jerkwater recycling: Treatment techniques and cost saving, World Water. Environmental Engineering 1996; 2: 18–19.
  36. Asano T, Maeda N, Takaki M. Wastewater reclamation and reuse in Japan: overview and implementation examples. Water Science and Technology 1996; 34: 219–226.
  37. Chin-Jung L, Shang-Lien L, Chao-Yin K, Chung-Hsin W. Pilot-Scale Electrocoagulation with Bipolar Aluminum Electrodes for On-Site Domestic Greywater Reuse. Journal of Environmental Engineering 2005; 131: 491-495.