A survey on the performance of moving bed biofilm reactor and rapid sand filter in wastewater treatment

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Department of Environmental Health Engineering, School of Public Health, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

2 Department of Environmental Health Engineering, Student Research Committee, School of Public Health, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

3 Department of Civil Engineering, School of Engineering and Technology, Islamic Azad University, Parand Branch, Tehran, Iran

4 Department of Water Resources, Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Moving bed biofilm reactor (MBBR) is a process in which attached growth is utilized for wastewater treatment. This process does not require sludge recycling or backwash. Activated sludge processes can be promoted to an MBBR by adding media to an aeration tank. Rapid sand filter is a physical method for the removal of total suspended solids (TSS) in advanced wastewater treatment. The purpose of this study was the evaluation of effluent reuse feasibility of MBBR and rapid sand filter in agricultural irrigation. Results showed TSS, biochemical oxygen demand (BOD5), and chemical oxygen demand (COD) concentrations in effluent were 10, 7.7, and 85.75 mg/l, respectively. Removal efficiency of TSS, BOD5, and COD was 98%, 98.8%, and 94.6%, respectively. Furthermore, the value of chemical parameters was less than the standard limitations. Average removal efficiency of total coliform, fecal coliform, and nematode was 100%. Total dissolved solids (TDS) and electrical conductivity (EC) in effluent were 960.5 mg/l and 1200.63 μs/cm, respectively. The Wilcox diagram showed that effluent was in the C3-S1 class, which means effluent quality was appropriate for irrigation. The results showed that effluent quality was completely compatible with the national standards in agricultural irrigation. 

Keywords

References

  1. Madoni P, Davoli D, Gibin G. Survey of filamentous microorganisms from bulking and foaming activated-sludge plants in Italy. Water Research 2000; 34(6): 1767-72.
  2. Tchobanoglous G, Burton FL, Stensel D. Wastewater Engineering: Treatment and Reuse. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Education; 2003. p. 4.
  3. Qdegaard H. The moving bed biofilm reactor [Online]. [cited 1999]; Available from: URL: http://netedu.xauat.edu.cn/jpkc/netedu/jpkc2009/szylyybh/content/wlzy/7/3/The%20Moving%20Bed%20Biofilm%20Reactor.pdf
  4. Andreottola G, Foladori R, Ragazzi M, Tat?no F. Experimental comparison between MBBR and activated sludge system for the treatment of municipal wastewater. Water Sci Technol 2000; 41(4): 375-82.
  5. Comett-Ambriz I, Gonzalez-Martinez S, Wilderer P. Comparison of the performance of MBBR and SBR systems for the treatment of anaerobic reactor biowaste effluent. Water Sci Technol 2003; 47(12): 155-61.
  6. Cao X, Liu J, Meng X. Evaluation of a slow sand filter in advanced wastewater treatment. Proceedings of the International Conference on Mechanic Automation and Control Engineering (MACE); 2010 Jun 26-38; Wuhan, China.
  7. Deboch B, Faris K. Evaluation of the efficiency of rapid sand filtration. Proceedings of the 25th Conference WEDC; 1999; Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
  8. Danesh S, Amin A. The use of wastewater in agriculture, opportunities and challenges. Proceedings of the 1st National Conference on the Role of Water Recycling and Wastewater Management; 2008 May 24; Mashhad, Iran. [In Persian].
  9. Aiello R, Cirelli GL, Consoli S. Effects of reclaimed wastewater irrigation on soil and tomato fruits: A case study in Sicily (Italy). Agricultural Water Management 2007; 93(1-2): 65-72.
  10. Chhonkar PK, Datta SP, Joshi HC, Pathak H. Impact of Industrial Effluents on Soil Health and Agriculture - Indian Experience: Part I - Distillery and Paper Mill Effluents. Journal of Scientific and Industrial Research 2000; 59(5): 350-61.
  11. Fatta D, Kythreotou N. Wastewater as valuable water resource-concerns, constraints and requirements related to reclamation, recycling and reuse. Proceedings of the IWA International Conference on Water Economics, Statistics and Finance; Water Economics, Statistics and Finance; Rethymno, Greece; 2005 Jul 8-10; London, UK.
  12. Taleb Bidokhti A, Dehghani MH, Azam K. Evaluation of the effluent quality of wastewater treatment plants in Tehran. Proceedings of the 12th National Conference on Environmental Health; 2009 Nov 10-12; Tehran, Iran. [In Persian].
  13. Asghari Moghaddam A. Feasibility of agricultural and industrial reuse for effluent of wastewater treatment plant of Tabriz. Proceedings of the 32nd National & the 1st International Geosciences Congress; 2014 Feb 16-19; Tehran, Iran. [In Persian].
  14. Pirsaheb M, Khodadadi T, Sharafi K, Dogohar K. Feasibility of Owlang Mashhad reuse of effluent for agricultural irrigation. Proceedings of the 3rd National Conference on Water and Wastewater approach to Operation; 2010 Feb 23-24; Tehran, Iran. [In Persian].
  15. Andreottola G, Foladori P, Gatti G, Nardelli P, Pettena M, Ragazzi M. Upgrading of a small overloaded activated sludge plant using a MBBR system. J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng 2003; 38(10): 2317-28.
  16. Eaton AD, Franson MA. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water & Wastewater. Washington, DC: American Public Health Association; 2005.
  17. Sawyer C, McCarty P, Parkin G. Chemistry for Environmental Engineering and Science. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Education; 2003.
  18. Richards LA. Diagnosis and improvement of saline and alkali soils. Washington, DC: U.S. Dept. of Agriculture; 1954.
  19. Alobaidy A, Al-Sameraiy M, Kadhem A, Majeed A. Evaluation of treated municipal wastewater quality for irrigation. J Environ Prot 2010; 1(3): 216-25.
  20. Altin A, Altin S, Degirmenci M. Characteristics and treatability of hospital (medical) wastewaters. Fresen Environ Bull 2003; 12(9): 1098-108.
  21. Borkar RP, Gulhane ML, Kotangale AJ. Moving bed biofilm reactor - a new perspective in wastewater treatment. IOSR Journal of Environmental Science, Toxicology and Food Technology 2013; 6(6): 15-21.
  22. Delnavaz M, Ayati B, Ganjidoust H. Prediction of moving bed biofilm reactor (MBBR) performance for the treatment of aniline using artificial neural networks (ANN). Journal of Hazardous Materials 2010; 179(1-3): 769-75.
  23. Al-A'ama MS, Nakhla GF. Wastewater reuse in Jubail, Saudi Arabia. Water Research 1995; 29(6): 1579-84.
  24. Mahmoudi M, Khamootian R, Dargahi A. Evaluation of Kermanshah city effluent for reuse in agriculture. Proceedings of the 1st National student Conference on Social Determinants of Health; 2010 Oct 13-14; Tehran, Iran. [In Persian].
  25. Amouei A, Ghanbari N, Kazemitabar M. Study of
  26. wastewater Treatment System in The Educational Hospitals of Babol University of Medical Sciences (2009). J Mazandaran Univ Med Sci 2010; 20(77): 78-86. [In Persian].
  27. Wilen BM, Johansen A, Mattsson A. Assessment of sludge particle removal from wastewater by disc filtration. Water Practice & Technology 2012; 7(2).
  28. Lubello C, Gori R, Nicese FP, Ferrini F. Municipal-treated wastewater reuse for plant nurseries irrigation. Water Res 2004; 38(12): 2939-47.
  29. Binavapour Esforoushani M, Koulivand A, Sabzevari A, Farzadkia M, Mohammad Taheri A, Zafari Pour H, et al. Investigation of irrigation reuse potential of wastewater treatment effluent from Hamedan Atieh-sazan general hospital. Water and Wastewater 2008; 18(4): 83-7. [In Persian].
  30. Hashemi H, Ebrahimi A, Khodabakhshi A. Survey on reuse of Isfahan wastewater treatment plants effluent in restricted irrigation. J Health Syst Res 2014; 10(2): 326-34. [In Persian].
Journal of Advances in Environmental Health Research
Volume 3, Issue 3 - Serial Number 3
13
August 2015
Pages 147-153

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics