Optimization of ammonia removal in an integrated fix-film activated sludge using response surface methodology


Department of Environmental Health, School of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran


In this work, removal of ammonia from synthetic wastewater using integrated fixed-film activated sludge (IFAS) process was optimized using response surface methodology (RSM). The main operating parameters such as ammonia concentration rate (ALR) and hydraulic retention time (HRT) were optimized to acquire the maximum removal efficiency. The linear, 2FI, quadratic, mean, and cubic models were utilized for modeling of the parameters. Residual nitrate and nitrite were determined as the byproducts. The results showed that the actual data fitted well with the predicted results. The maximum ammonia removal achieved using mean, linear, 2FI, quadratic, and cubic models were 59.88, 79.05, 79.32, 77.11, and 78.65%, respectively. Nitrate and nitrite were determined in ammonia concentrations of higher than 100 mg/l. The obtained results showed that RSM is a suitable technique for the optimization of conditions for the maximum removal of ammonia.


  1. Van Hulle SWH, Vandeweyer HJP, Meesschaert BD, Vanrolleghem PA, Dejans P, Dumoulin A. Engineering aspects and practical application of autotrophic nitrogen removal from nitrogen rich streams. Chemical Engineering Journal 2010; 162(1): 1-20.
  2. Hossini H, Rezaee A, Ayati B, Mahvi AH. Simultaneous nitrification and denitrification using a polypyrrole/microbial cellulose electrode in a membraneless bio-electrochemical system. RSC Adv 2015; 5(89): 72699-708.
  3. Li M, Feng C, Zhang Z, Yang S, Sugiura N. Treatment of nitrate contaminated water using an electrochemical method. Bioresour Technol 2010; 101(16): 6553-7.
  4. Virdis B, Rabaey K, Rozendal RA, Yuan Z, Keller J. Simultaneous nitrification, denitrification and carbon removal in microbial fuel cells. Water Res 2010; 44(9): 2970-80.
  5. Kaelin D, Manser R, Rieger L, Eugster J, Rottermann K, Siegrist H. Extension of ASM3 for two-step nitrification and denitrification and its calibration and validation with batch tests and pilot scale data. Water Res 2009; 43(6): 1680-92.
  6. Iacopozzi I, Innocenti V, Marsili-Libelli S, Giusti E. A modified Activated Sludge Model No. 3 (ASM3) with two-step nitrification-denitrification. Environmental Modelling & Software 2007; 22(847): 861.
  7. Francis CA, Roberts KJ, Beman JM, Santoro AE, Oakley BB. Ubiquity and diversity of ammonia-oxidizing archaea in water columns and sediments of the ocean. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2005; 102(41): 14683-8.
  8. Onnis-Hayden A, Majed N, Schramm A, Gu AZ. Process optimization by decoupled control of key microbial populations: distribution of activity and abundance of polyphosphate-accumulating organisms and nitrifying populations in a full-scale IFAS-EBPR plant. Water Res 2011; 45(13): 3845-54.
  9. Rosso D, Lothman SE, Jeung MK, Pitt P, Gellner WJ, Stone AL, et al. Oxygen transfer and uptake, nutrient removal, and energy footprint of parallel full-scale IFAS and activated sludge processes. Water Res 2011; 45(18): 5987-96.
  10. Jim?nez-Contreras E, Bail?n-Moreno R, Torres-Salinas D, Ruiz-Ba?os R, Ruiz-P?rez R, Moneda-Corrochano DL. Response Surface Methodology and its Application in Evaluating Scientific activity. Scientometrics 2009; 79(1): 201-18.
  11. Box GE, Wilson KB. On the Experimental Attainment of Optimum Conditions. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 1951; 13(1): 1-45.
  12. Bashir MJK, Aziz HA, Yusoff MS, Adlan M. Application of response surface methodology (RSM) for optimization of ammoniacal nitrogen removal from semi-aerobic landfill leachate using ion exchange resin. Desalination 2010; 254(1?3): 154-61.
  13. Kim YM, Park D, Jeon CO, Lee DS, Park JM. Effect of HRT on the biological pre-denitrification process for the simultaneous removal of toxic pollutants from cokes wastewater. Bioresour Technol 2008; 99(18): 8824-32.
  14. Cho S, Fujii N, Lee T, Okabe S. Development of a simultaneous partial nitrification and anaerobic ammonia oxidation process in a single reactor. Bioresour Technol 2011; 102(2): 652-9.
  15. Rostron WM, Stuckey DC, Young AA. Nitrification of high strength ammonia wastewaters: comparative study of immobilisation media. Water Res 2001; 35(5): 1169-78.
  16. Mourabet M, El Rhilassi A, El Boujaady H, Bennani-Ziatni M, El Hamri R, Taitai A. Removal of fluoride from aqueous solution by adsorption on hydroxyapatite (HAp) using response surface methodology. Journal of Saudi Chemical Society 2012.
  17. Mirazimi SMJ, Rashchi F, Saba M. Vanadium removal from roasted LD converter slag: Optimization of parameters by response surface methodology (RSM). Separation and Purification Technology 2013; 116: 175-83.
  18. Fang HY, Chou MS, Huang CW. Nitrification of ammonia-nitrogen in refinery wastewater. Water Research 1993; 27(12): 1761-5.
  19. Campos JL, Mosquera-Corral A, Sanchez M, Mendez R, Lema JM. Nitrification in saline wastewater with high ammonia concentration in an activated sludge unit. Water Res 2002; 36(10): 2555-60.
  20. Regmi P, Thomas W, Schafran G, Bott C, Rutherford B, Waltrip D. Nitrogen removal
  21. assessment through nitrification rates and media biofilm accumulation in an IFAS process demonstration study. Water Res 2011; 45(20): 6699-708.
  22. Ruiz G, Jeison D, Chamy R. Nitrification with high nitrite accumulation for the treatment of wastewater with high ammonia concentration. Water Res 2003; 37(6): 1371-7.