Assessment of dental waste production rate and management in Sari, Iran

Authors

1 Department of Environmental Health Engineering, School of Health AND Health Sciences Research Center, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran

2 Department of Environmental Health, Student Research Committee, School of Health, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran

Abstract

Dental offices produce a variety of dangerous wastes during normal business day. Most of these waste are non-hazardous that can be managed as household wastes; however, some component are hazardous and can pose a risk to human and the environment if discarded to Municipal Solid Wastes. These types of wastes must be managed separately. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess the component and production rate of dental waste in Sari city, northern of Iran in 2011-2012. A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted on 64 private dental practices from 146 available dental clinics in Sari city using a checklist and questionnaires which contain 25 questions and items. Dental wastes were weighed to determined qualitative and quantitative analysis. The data were analyzed using SPSS and MS-Excel. The results indicated that 77% of produced wastes were non-hazardous. The acceptable level management was observed only in 3.7% offices. The most desirable element management was accurate collecting (30.88%) in these offices. In general, it can be concluded that there is no proper management of wastes in dental centers of Sari. The mercury recycling is required for optimal management of dental waste. Furthermore, the dentists’ education must be takes place to perform the management activities including reduction, separation and recycling inside the office.

Keywords


  1. Arenholt-Bindslev D. Environmental aspects of dental filling materials. Eur J Oral Sci 1998; 106(2 Pt 2): 713-20.
  2. Kulivand A, Nabizadeh R, Joneidy A, Yunesian M, Omrany G. Quantity and Quality Analysis and Management of Solid Waste Produced in Dentistry Laboratories and Practical Dentist Offices in Hamedan 2007. Iran J Health Environ 2009; 2(1): 36-45. [In Persian].
  3. Kizlary E, Iosifidis N, Voudrias E, Panagiotakopoulos D. Composition and production rate of dental solid waste in Xanthi, Greece: variability among dentist groups. Waste Manag 2005; 25(6): 582-91.
  4. Ozbek M, Sanin FD. A study of the dental solid waste produced in a school of dentistry in Turkey. Waste Manag 2004; 24(4): 339-45.
  5. Barafrashteh M, Rezayi S, Alinejad A, Sadat A. Evaluation of dental wastes management in Yasouj. Proceedings of the 13th Congress of Iran Environmental Health; 2010 Nov 2-4; Kerman, Iran; 2010. p. 131-9. [In Persian].
  6. Landrum VJ. Medical Waste Management and Disposal. Park Ridge, NJ: Noyes Data Corporation; 1991.
  7. Cannata S, Bek M, Baker P, Fett M. Infection control and contaminated waste disposal practices in Southern Sydney Area Health Service Dental Clinics. Aust Dent J 1997; 42(3): 199-202.
  8. Darwish RO, Al-Khatib IA. Evaluation of dental waste management in two cities in Palestine. East Mediterr Health J 2006; 12(Suppl 2): S217-S222.
  9. Nafez A. Quantitative and qualitative survey of dentistry wastes in Qazvin city. Proceedings of the 12th Congress of Iran Environmental Health; 2009 Nov 2-4; Tehran, Iran; 2009. p. 2092-9. [In Persian].
  10. Sushma MK, Bhat S, Shetty SR, Babu SG. Biomedical dental waste management and awareness of waste management policy among private dental practitioners in Mangalore city, India. Tanzania Dental Journal 2010; 16(2): 39-43.
  11. Sudhakar V, Chandrashekar J. Dental health care waste disposal among private dental practices in Bangalore City, India. Int Dent J 2008; 58(1): 51-4.
  12. Rezai A ea. Survey of volume and weight of Infectious wastes in offices, laboratories, dressing, private radiology in Shiraz city. Proceedings of the 9th Congress of Iran Environmental Health; 2006 Nov 7-9; Isfahan, Iran; 2006. p. 219. [In Persian].
  13. Ogden GR, Bahrami M, Sivarajasingam V, Phillips G. Dental students' knowledge and compliance in cross infection control procedures at a UK dental hospital. Oral Dis 1997; 3(1): 25-30.
  14. Treasure ET, Treasure P. An investigation of the disposal of hazardous wastes from New Zealand dental practices. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1997; 25(4): 328-31.
  15. Nabizadeh R, Kulivand A, Jonidi Jafari A, Younesian M, Omrani G. Evaluation of dental solid waste in Hamedan. Journal of Dental Medicine 2009; 22(1): 66-73. [In Persian].
  16. Silberberger JE. Reducing Dental Mercury Discharge in Missoula, Montana: Collaborative Opportunities [Thesis]. Missoula, MT: University of Montana; 2007.
  17. Van Boom G, Richardson MK, Trip LJ. Waste Mercury in Dentistry: The Need for Management. Environmental Health Review 2003; 47(2): 33-9.
  18. Saunders TR, Guillory VL, Gregoire ST, Pimsler M, Mitchell MS. The effect of bioburden on in-depth disinfection of denture base acrylic resin. J Calif Dent Assoc 1998; 26(11): 846-50.
  19. Najafi Dolatabadi S, Mohebbi Nobandegani .Z, Ghafarian shirazi.H. Self-assessment of Yasuj dentists in field of regarding to principles of infection control. Dena Scientific Quarterly 2008; 3(1-2): 65-73. [In Persian].