Assessing the Environmental and Health Adverse Effects of Mercury Released From Dental Amalgam: A Literature Review

Document Type : Review Article(s)

Authors

Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.

10.32598/JAEHR.9.2.1212

Abstract

This paper reviews the most available data on the possible adverse effects of mercury released from amalgam that comprises 50% pure mercury, 35% silver, 12-13 % tin, 2% copper, and up to 1% zinc, indium, platinum, and palladium. Despite the possible health risks of mercury from amalgam on the nervous, respiratory, renal, and endocrine systems, it is used in some countries; however, Sweden, Denmark, Canada, the United States, and Japan have long banned the use of amalgam. Amalgam restorations are one of the main mercury-releasing sources (1800-2700 tons per year) of contamination. During chewing, grinding, brushing of teeth, breaking down of amalgam, and as the temperature of the oral environment increases, mercury vapor will be released. The mercury vapor enters the atmosphere, wastewater in dental offices, all systemic organs, especially the lower respiratory tract and can affect the renal-urinary system or enters breast milk, fetus, and finally, transmits to infants. The mercury level released from amalgam in blood, urine, hair, and nail of large populations of dentists, dental assistants, and pregnant women is higher than the safe levels. The main neurological and psychological effects of mercury vapor are sleep disorders, amnesia, mental disorders, hair loss, memory disturbances, multiple sclerosis, Parkinson’s disease, kidney diseases, gene toxicity, Alzheimer’s disease, Autism, skin allergies, cancer, infertility, low birth weight, and heart diseases. In order to avoid further amalgam risks to the dentists, dental assistants, pregnant women, and wildlife ecosystem, it is suggested to replace the dental amalgam with composite resins.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

  1. Jirau-Colón H, González-Parrilla L, Martinez-Jiménez J, Adam W, Jiménez-Velez B. Rethinking the dental amalgam dilemma: An integrated toxicological approach. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019; 16(6):1036. [DOI:10.3390/ijerph16061036] [PMID] [PMCID]
  2. UNEP DTIE Chemicals Branch, WHO Department of Food Safety, Zoonoses and Foodborne Diseases. Guidance for identifying populations at risk from mercury exposure [Internet]. 2008 [Updated 2008 August]. Available from: https://www.who.int/foodsafety/publications/chem/mercuryexposure.pdf
  3. Mutter J, Naumann J, Schneider R, Walach H, Haley B. Mercury and autism: Accelerating evidence? Neuro Endocrinol Lett. 2005; 26(5):439-46. [PMID]
  4. McGuire T. The poison in your teeth: Mercury amalgam (silver) fillings ... hazardous to your health. Sebastopol: The Dental Wellness Institute; 2008. https://www.dentalwellness4u.com/ebooks/Poison_eBook.pdf
  5. World Health Organization. Mercury in drinking-water: Background document for development of WHO guidelines for drinking-water quality [Internet]. 2005 [Updated 2005]. Available from: https://www.who.int/water_sanitation_health/dwq/chemicals/mercuryfinal.pdf
  6. World Health Organization. Environmental health criteria 118: Inorganic mercury [Internet]. 1991 [Updated 1991]. Available from: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/40626/IPCS_EHC_118.pdf;jsessionid=A55D94E1401A4315B0F4B99886C3F4D2?sequence=1
  7. Palmieri JR, Guthrie T, Kaur G, Collins E, Benjamin B, Brunette J, et al. Implications and significance of mercury in rice. J Food Nutr Metab. 2020; 3(2):2-5. [DOI:10.31487/j.JFNM.2020.02.02]
  8. Jedrzejczak R. Determination of total mercury in foods of plant origin in Poland by cold vapour atomic absorption spectrometry. Food Addit Contam. 2002; 19(10):996-1002. [DOI:10.1080/02652030210151912][PMID]
  9. Kasraei Sh, Mortazavi H, Vahedi M, Bakianian Vaziri P, Assary M. Blood mercury level and its determinants among dental practitioners in Hamadan, Iran. J Dent (Tehran). 2010; 7(2):55-63. [PMID][PMCID]
  10. United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). Lessons from countries phasing down dental amalgam use [Internet]. 2016 [Updated 2016 March]. Available from:https://wedocs.unep.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.11822/31212/Dental.pdf
  11. Mason R, Pirrone N, editors. Mercury fate and transport in the global atmosphere: Emissions, measurements and models. New York: Springer-Verlag; 2009. [DOI:10.1007/978-0-387-93958-2]
  12. Arenholt-Bindslev D. Dental amalgam— environmental aspects. Adv Dent Res. 1992; 6:125-30. [DOI:10.1177/08959374920060010501][PMID]
  13. Mitchell RJ, Okabe T. Setting reactions in dental amalgam. Part 1. Phases and microstructures between one hour and one week. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 1996; 7(1):12-22. [DOI:10.1177/10454411960070010101][PMID]
  14. Timbrell JA, Seabra V, Waterfield CJ. The in vivo and in vitro protective properties of taurine. Gen Pharmacol Vascul Syst. 1995; 26(3):453-62 [DOI:10.1016/0306-3623(94)00203-Y]
  15. Wilburn DR. Changing patterns in the use, recycling, and material substitution of mercury in the United States: U.S. Geological Survey scientific investigations report 2013-5137 [Internet]. 2013 [Updated 2013 August 6]. Available from: https://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/sir20135137 [DOI:10.3133/sir20135137]
  16. Environmental Protection Agency. Effluent limitations guidelines and standards for the dental category [Internet]. 2017 [Updated 2017 July 5]. Available from: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2017/06/14/2017-12338/effluent-limitations-guidelines-and-standards-for-the-dental-category
  17. Health and Environment Alliance (HEAL). 2. Mercury pollution – where does it come from? [Internet]. 2007 [Updated 2007]. Available from: https://www.env-health.org/IMG/pdf/mercury_chapter2.pdf
  18. Björkman L, Sandborgh-Englund G, Ekstrand J. Mercury in saliva and feces after removal of amalgam fillin Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 1997; 144(1):156-62. [DOI:10.1006/taap.1997.8128][PMID]
  19. Larose C, Dommergue A, Marusczak N, Coves J, Ferrari CP, Schneider D. Bioavailable mercury cycling in polar snowpacks. Environ Sci Technol. 2011; 45(6):2150-6. [DOI:10.1021/es103016x][PMID]
  20. Hylander LD, Goodsite ME. Environmental costs of mercury pollution. Sci Total Environ. 2006; 368(1):352-70. [DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2005.11.029][PMID]
  21. Stone ME, Cohen ME, Debban BA. Mercury vapor levels in exhaust air from dental vacuum systems. Dent Mater. 2007; 23(5):527-32. [DOI:10.1016/j.dental.2006.03.011][PMID]
  22. Jonidi Jafari A, Esrafili A, Moradi Y, Mahmoudi N. Mercury level in biological samples of dentists in Iran: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Environ Health Sci E 2020; 18(2):1655-69. [DOI:10.1007/s40201-020-00558-w][PMID]
  23. Barghi M, Dahmardeh Behrooz R, Esmaili-Sari A, Ghasempouri SM. Mercury exposure assessment in Iranian pregnant women’s hair with respect to diet, amalgam filling, and lactation. Biol Trace Elem Res. 2012; 148(3):292-301. [DOI:10.1007/s12011-012-9384-y][PMID]
  24. Norouzi E, Bahramifar N, Ghasempouri SM. Effect of teeth amalgam on mercury levels in the colostrums human milk in Lenjan. Environ Monit Assess. 2012; 184(1):375-80. [DOI:10.1007/s10661-011-1974-1][PMID]
  25. Risher JF. Concise international chemical assessment document 50: Elemental mercury and inorganic mercury compounds: Human health aspects [Internet]. 2003 [Updated 2003]. Available from: https://www.who.int/ipcs/publications/cicad/en/cicad50.pdf
  26. Akbari M, Velayati Moghaddam F, Ahmadi A, Afshari R. [Evaluation of urinary mercury concentrations in general dentists and restorative specialists in Mashhad in 2010 (Persian)]. J Birjand Univ Med Sci. 2013; 19(4):416-21. http://journal.bums.ac.ir/article-1-1216-en.html
  27. Zolfaghari Gh, Esmaeili Sari A, Ghasempouri SM, Faghihzadeh S. [Evaluation of mercury concentration in hair of dentists and survey of factors influencing its levels (Persian)]. J Environ Sci Technol. 2010; 12(3):149-60. https://jest.srbiau.ac.ir/article_153.html
  28. Chigbo FE, Smith RW, Shore FL. Uptake of arsenic, cadmium, lead and mercury from polluted waters by the water hyacinth Eichornia crassipes. Environ Pollut Ser A Ecol Biol. 1982; 27(1):31-6. [DOI:10.1016/0143-1471(82)90060-5]
  29. Oken E, Wright RO, Kleinman KP, Bellinger D, Amarasiriwardena CJ, Hu H, et al. Maternal fish consumption, hair mercury, and infant cognition in a U.S. Cohort. Environ Health Perspect. 2005; 113(10):1376-80. [DOI:10.1289/ehp.8041][PMID][PMCID]
  30. Goodrich JM, Chou HN, Gruninger SE, Franzblau A, Basu N. Exposures of dental professionals to elemental mercury and methylmercury. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2016; 26(1):78-85. [DOI:10.1038/jes.2015.52][PMID][PMCID]
  31. World Health Organization. Children’s exposure to mercury compounds [Internet]. 2010 [Updated 2010]. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/44445/9789241500456_eng.pdf
  32. Golding J, Steer CD, Gregory S, Lowery T, Hibbeln JR, Taylor CM. Dental associations with blood mercury in pregnant wo Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2016; 44(3):216-22. [DOI:10.1111/cdoe.12208][PMID][PMCID]
  33. Morton J, Mason HJ, Ritchie KA, White M. Comparison of hair, nails and urine for biological monitoring of low level inorganic mercury exposure in dental workers. Biomarkers. 2004; 9(1):47-55. [DOI:10.1080/13547500410001670312][PMID]
  34. Samir AM, Aref WM. Impact of occupational exposure to elemental mercury on some antioxidative enzymes among dental staff. Toxicol Ind Health. 2011; 27(9):779-86. [DOI:10.1177/0748233710397420][PMID]
  35. Jamil N, Baqar M, Ilyas S, Qadir A, Arslan M, Salman M, et al. Use of mercury in dental silver amalgam: An occupational and environmental assessment. Biomed Res Int. 2016; 2016:6126385. [DOI:10.1155/2016/6126385][PMID][PMCID]
  36. Tezel H, Ertas OS, Erakin C, Kayali A. Blood mercury levels of dental students and dentists at a dental school. Br Dent J. 2001; 191(8):449-52. [DOI:10.1038/sj.bdj.4801205][PMID]
  37. Karahalil B, Rahravi H, Ertas N. Examination of urinary mercury levels in dentists in Turkey. Hum Exp Toxicol. 2005; 24(8):383-8. [DOI:10.1191/0960327105ht541oa][PMID]
  38. Möller-Madsen B, Hansen JC, Kragstrup J. Mercury concentrations in blood from Danish dentists. Eur J Oral Sci. 1988; 96(1):56-9. [DOI:10.1111/j.1600-0722.1988.tb01408.x][PMID]
  39. Ventura DF, Simões AL, Tomaz S, Costa MF, Lago M, Costa MT, et al. Colour vision and contrast sensitivity losses of mercury intoxicated industry workers in Brazil. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol. 2005; 19(3):523-9. [DOI:10.1016/j.etap.2004.12.016][PMID]
  40. Mutter J, Naumann J, Sadaghiani C, Walach H, Drasch G. Amalgam studies: Disregarding basic principles of mercury toxicity. Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2004; 207(4):391-7. [DOI:10.1078/1438-4639-00305][PMID]
  41. Shraim A, Alsuhaimi A, Al-Thakafy JT. Dental clinics: A point pollution source, not only of mercury but also of other amalgam constituents. Chemosphere. 2011; 84(8):1133-9. [DOI:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2011.04.034][PMID]
  42. Megremis S, Carey CM. Corrosion and tarnish of dental alloys[Internet]. 2006 [Updated 2006]. Available from:https://tsapps.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=852614
  43. World Health Organization. Water, Sanitation and Health Team. Mercury in health care: Policy paper [Internet]. 2005 [Updated 2005]. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/69129
  44. Nagpal N, Bettiol SS, Isham A, Hoang H, Crocombe LA. A review of mercury exposure and health of dental personnel. Saf Health Work. 2017; 8(1):1-10. [DOI:10.1016/j.shaw.2016.05.007][PMID][PMCID]
  45. Pugach S, Clarkson T. Prenatal mercury exposure and postnatal outcome: Clinical case report and analysis. Clin Toxicol. 2009; 47(4):366-70. [DOI:10.1080/15563650902866911][PMID]
  46. Mirzakouchaki P, Rashidi F, Hassanli E, Karbalaiefar S. [Relationship between the number of tooth surfaces restored with amalgam and mothers’ breast milk mercury levels: A preliminary study (Persian)]. J Isfahan Dent Sch. 2013; 8(7):645-51. https://jids.journalonweb.ir/index.php/jids/article/view/572
  47. Hujoel PP, Lydon-Rochelle M, Bollen AM, Woods JS, Geurtsen W, de Aguila MA. Mercury exposure from dental filling placement during pregnancy and low birth weight risk. Am J Epidemiol. 2005; 161(8):734-40. [DOI:10.1093/aje/kwi100][PMID]
  48. Mutter J, Naumann J, Walach H, Daschner F. [Amalgam risk assessment with coverage of references up to 2005. Gesundheitswesen (German)]. 2005; 67(3):204-16. [DOI:10.1055/s-2005-857962][PMID]
  49. Hsu YC, Chang CW, Lee HL, Chuang CC, Chiu HC, Li WY, et al. Association between history of dental amalgam fillings and risk of Parkinson’s disease: A population retrospective cohort study in Taiwan. PLoS One. 2016; 11(12):e0166552. [DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0166552][PMID][PMCID]
  50. Nicolae A, Ames H, Quiñonez C. Dental amalgam and urinary mercury concentrations: A descriptive study. BMC Oral Health. 2013; 13:44. [DOI:10.1186/1472-6831-13-44][PMID][PMCID]
  51. Mutter J, Daschner FD. Commentary regarding the article by Gottwald et al.: "Amalgam disease"--poisoning, allergy, or psychic disorder? Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health 204, 223-229 (2001). Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2003; 206(1):69-70. [DOI:10.1078/1438-4639-00185][PMID]
  52. Bailer J, Rist F, Rudolf A, Staehle HJ, Eickholz P, Triebig G, et al. Adverse health effects related to mercury exposure from dental amalgam fillings: Toxicological or psychological causes? Psychol Med. 2001; 31(2):255-63. [DOI:10.1017/S0033291701003233][PMID]
  53. Greenberg MS, Glick M, Ship JA. Burket’s oral medicine, diagnosis and treatment .11th Hamilton: BC Decker Inc; 2008. pp. 88-89. https://books-library.net/files/download-pdf-ebooks.org-1519307052Nl3O9.pdf
  54. Azizi A, Molaei N, Lavaf S, Semsar Y. [Oral lichen planus and dental amalgam restorations (Persian)]. J Res Dent Sci. 2012; 9(3):170-4. http://jrds.ir/article-1-159-fa.html
  55. Mårell L, Tillberg A, Widman L, Bergdahl J, Berglund A. Regression of oral lichenoid lesions after replacement of dental restorations. J Oral Rehabil. 2014; 41(5):381-91. [DOI:10.1111/joo12151][PMID]
  56. Fakour H, Esmaili-Sari A, Zayeri F. Scalp hair and saliva as biomarkers in determination of mercury levels in Iranian women: Amalgam as a determinant of exposure. J Hazard Mater. 2010; 177(1-3):109-13. [DOI:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.12.002][PMID]
  57. Neghab M, Choobineh AR, Hassan Zadeh J, Ghaderi E. Symptoms of intoxication in dentists associated with exposure to low levels of mercury. Ind Health. 2011; 49(2):249-54. [DOI:10.2486/indhealth.MS1214][PMID]
  58. Moen BE, Hollund BE, Riise T. Neurological symptoms among dental assistants: A cross-sectional study. J Occup Med Toxicol. 2008; 3:10. [DOI:10.1186/1745-6673-3-10][PMID][PMCID]
  59. Sletvold H, Svendsen K, Aas O, Syverson T, Hilt B. Neuropsychological function and past exposure to metallic mercury in female dental workers. Scand J Psychol. 2012; 53(2):136-43. [DOI:10.1111/j.1467-9450.2011.00929.x][PMID][PMCID]
  60. Thygesen LC, Flaschs EM, Hanehøj K, Kjuus H, Juel K. Hospital admissions for neurological and renal diseases among dentists and dental assistants occupationally exposed to mercury. Occup Environ Med. 2011; 68(12):895-901. [DOI:10.1136/oem.2010.064063][PMID]
  61. Jones L, Bunnell J, Stillman J. A 30-year follow-up of residual effects on New Zealand School Dental Nurses, from occupational mercury exposure. Hum Exp Toxicol. 2007; 26(4):367-74. [DOI:10.1177/0960327107076824][PMID]
  62. Aydin N, Karaoglanoglu S, Yigit A, Keles MS, Kirpinar I, Seven N. Neuropsychological effects of low mercury exposure in dental staff in Erzurum, Turkey. Int Dent J. 2003; 53(2):85-91. [DOI:10.1111/j.1875-595X.2003.tb00664.x][PMID]
  63. Paknahad M, Mortazavi SM, Shahidi Sh, Mortazavi Gh, Haghani M. Effect of radiofrequency radiation from Wi-Fi devices on mercury release from amalgam restorations. J Environ Health Sci Eng. 2016; 14:12. [DOI:10.1186/s40201-016-0253-z][PMID][PMCID]
  64. Lygre GB, Haug K, Skjaerven R, Björkman L. Prenatal exposure to dental amalgam and pregnancy outcome. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2016; 44(5):442-9. [DOI:10.1111/cdoe.12233][PMID]
  65. Sun YH, Nfor ON, Huang JY, Liaw YP. Association between dental amalgam fillings and Alzheimer’s disease: A population-based cross-sectional study in Taiwan. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2015; 7(1):65. [DOI:10.1186/s13195-015-0150-1][PMID][PMCID]
  66. Anglen J, Gruninger SE, Chou HN, Weuve J, Turyk ME, Freels S, et al. Occupational mercury exposure in association with prevalence of multiple sclerosis and tremor among US dentists. J Am Dent A 2015; 146(9):659-68.e1. [DOI:10.1016/j.adaj.2015.05.016][PMID]
  67. Ahlqwist M, Bengtsson C, Lapidus L. Number of amalgam fillings in relation to cardiovascular disease, diabetes, cancer and early death in Swedish women. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1993; 21(1):40-4. [DOI:10.1111/j.1600-0528.1993.tb00717.x][PMID]
  68. Moszczyński P. [Mercury and the risk of coronary heart disease (Polish)]. Przegl Lek. 2006; 63 Suppl 7:84-7. [PMID]
  69. Oliveira MT, Constantino HV, Molina GO, Milioli E, Ghizoni JS, Pereira JR. Evaluation of mercury contamination in patients and water during amalgam removal. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2014; 15(2):165-8. [DOI:10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1508][PMID]
  70. Rothwell JA, Boyd PJ. Amalgam dental fillings and hearing loss. Int J Audiol. 2008; 47(12):770-6. [DOI:10.1080/14992020802311224][PMID]
  71. Berniyanti T, Hariyani N. Side effects of mercury in dental amalgam. Dent J. 2008; 41(1):30-4. [DOI:10.20473/j.djmkg.v41.i1.p30-34]
  72. Tibau AV, Grube BD. Mercury contamination from dental amalgam. J Health Pollut. 2019; 9(22):190612. [DOI:10.5696/2156-9614-9.22.190612][PMID][PMCID]

 

Journal of Advances in Environmental Health Research
Volume 9, Issue 2
April 2021
Pages 91-104

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics